Happy New Year is what everyone is saying now.
I say also, may God Bless you All for this 2009 year.
Unfortunately, I spent the first hours of the New Year in a Hospital.
My wife was brought by Ambulance to the nearest Hospital for a Kidney stone that caused her more pain then the most intense Labor contractions.
I myself am a Healthcare worker, so I know how the system works in the ER.
Lengthy waits and noisy rooms are expected, but RUDE and UNPROFESSIONAL STAFF ARE NOT EXPECTED.
Here is what happened, the Ambulance brought my wife to the ER and I stayed at home to watch our 3 young children. When I found someone to come over and watch our kids for an hour so I could go to the ER and see what was up with my wife, it was about 3 hours later.
As soon as I get to my wife's room in the ER, she is complaining of INTENSE PAIN. She begs me to get the Nurse and get some pain meds. I tell the Nurse and she says, "She just got some", in a callous sort of way. I responded by saying, "Well it's not enough". My Wife continues to moan even LOUDER in INTENSE PAIN.
5 minutes later, the Doctor walks in. He does not identify himself to me. He Callously says in a Condescending way, "Maam, you've got to stop that, you just started that act when He got here and I got here". I WAS INSENSED! I stated to this Condescending Doctor that my Wife NEVER complains of pain unless it really hurts. He proceeds to tell me all the medications that she received. I stated to him, "It is not enough, so get some more".
The idiot Doctor leaves and 5 minutes later, another Nurse gives my wife some stronger pain medication that does indeed work and puts her to sleep. Thank God.
This kind of Condescending, Callous attitude by both the 1rst Nurse and the Doctor is a prime example of how many Healthcare, and many American workers in general do not understand CUSTOMER SERVICE.
Poor Customer Service by these Healthcare workers is one of the many problems with our Healthcare system.
People, especially sick people in the Hospital are not to be treated like Cattle. Pain is Subjective and needs to be dealt with SERIOUSLY. People are Not to be made fun of or automatically Assumed to be overacting and not really in pain.
I wanted to bop this idiot Doctor in the nose.
Well, 3 hours later they discharged her home and said that the stone should pass on its own.
Thankfully, my Wife did not have Appendicitis or something more serious.
I will leave you with some New Year's Resolutions:
Pray more this year. Read the Bible more this year. Spend more time with your family this year. Love God more this year. Learn something new this year. Lose that extra Fat this year.
Make more money this year.
Jimbo
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
Christmas is Here. God sends His Son Jesus to Save the World
Merry Christmas to all.
I Love this Holiday the most.
What is Christmas you ask?
It is simply that God, in His infinite Complete Love for Mankind, came down from Heaven in the form of a human, born from a Virgin, Mary.
His Name is Called Jesus. He is the Son of God, God the Son.
He came to live and teach us how much God loves us.
However, he Mainly came to DIE. That's right. God came down to earth as Jesus for the Main purpose of Dying on the Cross and shedding His blood.
The Greatest thing is that three days later Jesus rose from the grave VICTORIOUS over death.
This is what Christmas is all about. Jesus. Not Santa, or gifts, or decorations, even though those things are good.
So don't be shy and say Merry Christmas to everyone you see today and tomorrow.
Jimbo
Friday, December 19, 2008
Calif. Attorney General says to Supreme Court, "Forget the Voters"
This past Nov. California Voters (for the 2nd time) said NO to Gay Marriage. And after the 1rst time the voters said NO to Gay Marriage, the California Supreme Court Overruled the Voters but said that if the Voters voted for an Amendment banning Gay Marriage that would be it, right? Wrong.This idiot Attorney General, who is supposed to uphold the law, is urging the California Supreme Court to VOID the will of the Voters and Cancel out the already passed Prop. 8.
You can't keep changing the rules, Mr. Jerry Brown.
Jerry Brown filed a brief Friday saying the measure that amended the California Constitution to limit marriage to a man and a woman is unconstitutional. He says it deprives gay couples of a fundamental right.
Fundamental right? What right? Right now, Gays in California have ALL the same rights as married Straight folks, in the form of Civil Unions.
9 out of 10 Chinese people in California and 7 out of 10 Blacks voted Yes to Prop. 8 and therefore NO to Gay Marriage.
But Jerry Brown, who is in bed with the Gays (no pun intended) can't think of anything better to do with his time but flip off the Voters and Push his Gay agenda.
The Supreme Court could hear arguments in the litigation as soon as March. The measure's backers announced Friday that Starr, a former federal judge and U.S. solicitor general, had signed on as their lead counsel and would argue the cases.
Proposition 8's supporters assert that the Supreme Court lacks the authority or historical precedent to throw out the amendment.
"For this court to rule otherwise would be to tear asunder a lavish body of jurisprudence," the court papers state. "That body of decisional law commands judges — as servants of the people — to bow to the will of those whom they serve — even if the substantive result of what people have wrought in constitution-amending is deemed unenlightened."
AMEN and AMEN.
Voters in California. Keep fighting the Gay Mafia. Let us pray that the Supreme Court does the right thing and respect the Will of the Voters for once.
Jimbo
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Madoff Scams 50 Billion, gets House arrest in 7 Million dollar Apartment
Bernard Madoff, accused of the largest fraud in U.S. history, will be allowed to remain in his $7 million Park Avenue apartment instead of being sent to jail, under terms of an agreement announced today by federal prosecutors.
This Scumbag, Madoff, scammed over 50 Billion with his Ponzi Scheme, wiping out scores of individual investors Life Savings, yet he still gets to stay at home in his posh New York Apt.
While the defrauded investors are left with NOTHING. Many hard working Americans are left DEAD BROKE at ages in their lives where its very difficult, if not impossible to get this money back.
Yet here is Madoff, laughing, yet BOASTING about ripping off tons of innocent people.
Bernard Madoff Investment Securities was the 23rd largest market maker on NASDAQ in October, handling a daily average of about 50 million shares a day. The firm specialized in handling orders from online brokers in some of the largest U.S. companies, including General Electric Co. and Citigroup Inc., Bloomberg News reported.
But on Dec. 10, Madoff allegedly told senior employees at his firm that his entire business was a fraud. According to the federal complaint, Madoff told those employees that he was "finished" and that "it's all one big lie." Madoff estimated "the losses from the fraud to be at least approximately $50 billion," the complaint states.
Here is the kicker, if you get caught shoplifting diapers and baby formula from Walmart and are not be able to post bail, you can bet you'll be cooling your heels in the county jail. Steal $50 billion from friends and if you're a Wall Street big wig with connections you go to your $7 million apartment.
My question is: Where did Madoff stash all that money??
His assets need to be seized and Madoff needs to be taken from his fancy apartment, in handcuffs, and sent directly to jail until the trial. Then sell off ALL his assets and repay those who were defrauded.
Here is the bottom line: The rich have their justice system and the poor has another. The idea that justice is blind is a joke. Judging and punishing men and women differently based on there riches will lead the people to the streets one day demanding a revolution to bring equal justice to all.
Jimbo
This Scumbag, Madoff, scammed over 50 Billion with his Ponzi Scheme, wiping out scores of individual investors Life Savings, yet he still gets to stay at home in his posh New York Apt.
While the defrauded investors are left with NOTHING. Many hard working Americans are left DEAD BROKE at ages in their lives where its very difficult, if not impossible to get this money back.
Yet here is Madoff, laughing, yet BOASTING about ripping off tons of innocent people.
Bernard Madoff Investment Securities was the 23rd largest market maker on NASDAQ in October, handling a daily average of about 50 million shares a day. The firm specialized in handling orders from online brokers in some of the largest U.S. companies, including General Electric Co. and Citigroup Inc., Bloomberg News reported.
But on Dec. 10, Madoff allegedly told senior employees at his firm that his entire business was a fraud. According to the federal complaint, Madoff told those employees that he was "finished" and that "it's all one big lie." Madoff estimated "the losses from the fraud to be at least approximately $50 billion," the complaint states.
Here is the kicker, if you get caught shoplifting diapers and baby formula from Walmart and are not be able to post bail, you can bet you'll be cooling your heels in the county jail. Steal $50 billion from friends and if you're a Wall Street big wig with connections you go to your $7 million apartment.
My question is: Where did Madoff stash all that money??
His assets need to be seized and Madoff needs to be taken from his fancy apartment, in handcuffs, and sent directly to jail until the trial. Then sell off ALL his assets and repay those who were defrauded.
Here is the bottom line: The rich have their justice system and the poor has another. The idea that justice is blind is a joke. Judging and punishing men and women differently based on there riches will lead the people to the streets one day demanding a revolution to bring equal justice to all.
Jimbo
Friday, December 12, 2008
Stop Blaming Labor!
Yesterday, Congress decided NOT to extend bailout money to the Big Three Automakers (Ford, GM, Chrysler). The Senate Republicans blocked it claiming that the "Problem" was UAW (United Auto Workers Union) and that the Average worker needed to take a PAY CUT.
Now, I don't recall anyone yelling for pay cuts of the Financial Services Industry, yet they received a $700 BILLION bailout and all the Automakers wanted was $34 Billion. That is about 5% of what Wall St. got.
Yet where were the cries for "Pay Cuts" amongst that MUCH BIGGER bailout???
And while we are on the subject, since the Government is running a HUGE Deficit, why don't the Senators and Congressman take a Pay Cut. Seeing how they make about $80/hr as compared to the $29/hr of the average Auto worker.
What a bunch of Rich Elitist Hypocrites!
This Automaker bailout will save approximately 3 MILLION JOBS at about an average cost of $5000 per worker to the taxpayers. That's it, just $5000 per worker.
But, if the Big 3 go into bankruptcy and these workers become unemployed, we the taxpayers will be paying upwards of $20,000 per worker in unemployment benefits.
So we will save the taxpayers, and save these jobs with a mere $34 billion, which is just 5% of the Wall St. bailout.
Someone go down and grab Bob Corker and yell at him. I mean this is why people are voting democrat. The Republicans are killing their image by being against the hard-working, average Laborer.
The Republicans need to be the party FOR LABOR and FOR the WORKER. But they are currently not, and the average worker knows this.
Shame on the Republicans.
Jimbo
Now, I don't recall anyone yelling for pay cuts of the Financial Services Industry, yet they received a $700 BILLION bailout and all the Automakers wanted was $34 Billion. That is about 5% of what Wall St. got.
Yet where were the cries for "Pay Cuts" amongst that MUCH BIGGER bailout???
And while we are on the subject, since the Government is running a HUGE Deficit, why don't the Senators and Congressman take a Pay Cut. Seeing how they make about $80/hr as compared to the $29/hr of the average Auto worker.
What a bunch of Rich Elitist Hypocrites!
This Automaker bailout will save approximately 3 MILLION JOBS at about an average cost of $5000 per worker to the taxpayers. That's it, just $5000 per worker.
But, if the Big 3 go into bankruptcy and these workers become unemployed, we the taxpayers will be paying upwards of $20,000 per worker in unemployment benefits.
So we will save the taxpayers, and save these jobs with a mere $34 billion, which is just 5% of the Wall St. bailout.
Someone go down and grab Bob Corker and yell at him. I mean this is why people are voting democrat. The Republicans are killing their image by being against the hard-working, average Laborer.
The Republicans need to be the party FOR LABOR and FOR the WORKER. But they are currently not, and the average worker knows this.
Shame on the Republicans.
Jimbo
Monday, December 8, 2008
15 Year NAFTA Anniversary of a Failed Policy
Today, 15yrs ago, NAFTA was signed into Law by President Clinton. It effectively removed ALL Tariffs between Canada, USA, and Mexico.
Ross Perot warned us to hear the "Giant Sucking Sound" of thousands of jobs leaving the USA and going to Mexico.
Many people dismissed him as "paranoid", "protectionist".
Well 15yrs. later and MILLIONS of LOST JOBS later, we see that Ross Perot was RIGHT.
Except now many of those jobs that went South to Mexico, now have left Mexico for even CHEAPER SLAVE LABOR in CHINA.
I remember that right after NAFTA was passed, Mexico devalued its currency and went into even worse economic condition.
Company after Company has now left the USA for cheap, slave labor in first Mexico, but now more so in China.
China has become the WORLD FACTORY.
Both Republicans and Democrats are to blame.
What we are left with is cheap, sorry quality crapola + a few hundred LOW PAYING Service Jobs.
Shame Shame Shame on Congress for passing this horrible bill and letting it spread to even cheaper labor in communist red China.
We foolishly believed we were all in this together, equal partners in a bold new venture to create jobs and prosperity across the hemisphere. What we failed to realize is that despite the American flag lapel pins their CEOs wore, U.S. corporations have no “American” interest in their global wheeling and dealing. Only the bottom line matters. They saw NAFTA as a superhighway to drive down wages, and they put the pedal to the metal. Shuttered factories and loss of manufacturing jobs have made voters angry and frustrated.
People in the USA make the best quality products. China makes Garbage products.
People in the USA will pay a few bucks more if they know that "drill" or "shovel" or "whatever" they buy is made by their neighbor here in the USA and keeping him employed and the community healthy.
We just plain don't need any more so called Free Trade deals like NAFTA or CAFTA.
We don't need anymore cheap $3.00 T-shirts or $1.00 toys from China.
What we need are more HIGH PAYING MANUFACTURING JOBS IN THE USA.
Call your Congressmen to support higher Tariffs just say NO to any more outsourcing jobs out of the USA.
Jimbo
Ross Perot warned us to hear the "Giant Sucking Sound" of thousands of jobs leaving the USA and going to Mexico.
Many people dismissed him as "paranoid", "protectionist".
Well 15yrs. later and MILLIONS of LOST JOBS later, we see that Ross Perot was RIGHT.
Except now many of those jobs that went South to Mexico, now have left Mexico for even CHEAPER SLAVE LABOR in CHINA.
I remember that right after NAFTA was passed, Mexico devalued its currency and went into even worse economic condition.
Company after Company has now left the USA for cheap, slave labor in first Mexico, but now more so in China.
China has become the WORLD FACTORY.
Both Republicans and Democrats are to blame.
What we are left with is cheap, sorry quality crapola + a few hundred LOW PAYING Service Jobs.
Shame Shame Shame on Congress for passing this horrible bill and letting it spread to even cheaper labor in communist red China.
We foolishly believed we were all in this together, equal partners in a bold new venture to create jobs and prosperity across the hemisphere. What we failed to realize is that despite the American flag lapel pins their CEOs wore, U.S. corporations have no “American” interest in their global wheeling and dealing. Only the bottom line matters. They saw NAFTA as a superhighway to drive down wages, and they put the pedal to the metal. Shuttered factories and loss of manufacturing jobs have made voters angry and frustrated.
People in the USA make the best quality products. China makes Garbage products.
People in the USA will pay a few bucks more if they know that "drill" or "shovel" or "whatever" they buy is made by their neighbor here in the USA and keeping him employed and the community healthy.
We just plain don't need any more so called Free Trade deals like NAFTA or CAFTA.
We don't need anymore cheap $3.00 T-shirts or $1.00 toys from China.
What we need are more HIGH PAYING MANUFACTURING JOBS IN THE USA.
Call your Congressmen to support higher Tariffs just say NO to any more outsourcing jobs out of the USA.
Jimbo
Friday, December 5, 2008
Planned Parenthood Covers Up Child Abuse! Shocking!
That's right, Planned Parenthood of Indiana is caught on tape LYING to what they thought was a 13yr. old girl.
Planned Parenthood continues to blatantly violate its trust with families and women.
This video is first in a series of hidden camera footage, collected over the summer, documenting the sexual abuse cover-up of the abortion industry across the nation.
Despite a consistent pattern of lawlessness and abuse, Planned Parenthood, a tax-exempt "nonprofit", made over $100 million in profits last year and has a billion-dollar budget. Planned Parenthood receives over $300 million from taxpayers.
Planned Parenthood, a tax-exempt nonprofit, made over $100 million in profits last year and has a billion-dollar budget, nearly a third of which comes from taxpayers through government funding.
Watch the Video here:
The footage shows Lila Rose, a UCLA student journalist and president of right-to-life advocacy group Live Action, posing as a 13-year-old girl. In an appointment with a Planned Parenthood nurse, Rose says she has been impregnated by a 31-year-old man, a clear case of child molestation under Indiana state law.
On tape, the nurse acknowledges her responsibility to report the abuse, but assures Rose she will not. The nurse says, "I am supposed to report to Child Protective Services," but tells Rose, "Okay, I didn't hear the age [of the 31-year-old]. I don't want to know the age."
She then instructs Rose how to obtain a secret abortion by crossing state lines in order to avoid Indiana's parental consent law. The nurse also coaches Rose to cover for the 31-year-old man by saying he is only 14. She says, "You've seen him around, you know he's 14, he's in your grade and whatever. You know what I mean."
Jackie Stollar, student president of a Live Action chapter in Oregon, accompanied Rose on the investigation. "In a repeated pattern, Planned Parenthood has violated the public trust. It should have its government funding revoked," she said. "During an economic crisis, can the government really spare $300 million to support such an unethical organization?"
"The Mona Lisa Project demonstrates how quickly the abortion industry's disrespect for unborn children becomes disregard for all humans," Rose explained. "Planned Parenthood offers no solutions for the victim of statutory rape—they give her an abortion and a bag of condoms and send her straight back into the arms of the abuser."
This is why absolutely NO MONEY from our Government should go to Planned Parenthood.
This is an outrage. Planned Parenthood needs to be SHUT DOWN.
Call your Congressman and Senator now.
Jimbo
Planned Parenthood continues to blatantly violate its trust with families and women.
This video is first in a series of hidden camera footage, collected over the summer, documenting the sexual abuse cover-up of the abortion industry across the nation.
Despite a consistent pattern of lawlessness and abuse, Planned Parenthood, a tax-exempt "nonprofit", made over $100 million in profits last year and has a billion-dollar budget. Planned Parenthood receives over $300 million from taxpayers.
Planned Parenthood, a tax-exempt nonprofit, made over $100 million in profits last year and has a billion-dollar budget, nearly a third of which comes from taxpayers through government funding.
Watch the Video here:
The footage shows Lila Rose, a UCLA student journalist and president of right-to-life advocacy group Live Action, posing as a 13-year-old girl. In an appointment with a Planned Parenthood nurse, Rose says she has been impregnated by a 31-year-old man, a clear case of child molestation under Indiana state law.
On tape, the nurse acknowledges her responsibility to report the abuse, but assures Rose she will not. The nurse says, "I am supposed to report to Child Protective Services," but tells Rose, "Okay, I didn't hear the age [of the 31-year-old]. I don't want to know the age."
She then instructs Rose how to obtain a secret abortion by crossing state lines in order to avoid Indiana's parental consent law. The nurse also coaches Rose to cover for the 31-year-old man by saying he is only 14. She says, "You've seen him around, you know he's 14, he's in your grade and whatever. You know what I mean."
Jackie Stollar, student president of a Live Action chapter in Oregon, accompanied Rose on the investigation. "In a repeated pattern, Planned Parenthood has violated the public trust. It should have its government funding revoked," she said. "During an economic crisis, can the government really spare $300 million to support such an unethical organization?"
"The Mona Lisa Project demonstrates how quickly the abortion industry's disrespect for unborn children becomes disregard for all humans," Rose explained. "Planned Parenthood offers no solutions for the victim of statutory rape—they give her an abortion and a bag of condoms and send her straight back into the arms of the abuser."
This is why absolutely NO MONEY from our Government should go to Planned Parenthood.
This is an outrage. Planned Parenthood needs to be SHUT DOWN.
Call your Congressman and Senator now.
Jimbo
Sunday, November 30, 2008
If Republicans want to Start Winning, it is time they become Protectionists
This last election period, the Republicans lost many seats in both the House and the Senate, not to mention the Presidency.
From the presidency to both chambers of Congress and from traditionally “free trade” Florida to Colorado and New York to New Mexico, successful candidates in 2008 election races ran on a platform of fundamental overhaul of U.S. trade and globalization policies including a growing number of Republicans, with a net increase in Congress of at least 30 fair trade supporters, according to the new report “Fair Trade Gets an Upgrade” by Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division. The number of fair-trade pick-ups in Congress may increase depending on the results of several races not yet called.
“The 2008 election was a veritable tipping point for fair-trade issues, which just reinforces what polls have increasingly shown: The public has had it with the current race-to-the-bottom trade and globalization model, and they voted against those who support it and for those who say they will replace it,” said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division. “Public expectations after this trade-focused election create pressure to fix the existing trade agreements and policies while further marginalizing various Bush hangover proposals, such as an expansion of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to Colombia, a bilateral investment treaty with China, and more financial service liberalization through the Korea Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization (WTO) Doha Round.”
A total of 33 new fair-traders won seats in the House of Representatives, which represents a net change of 26. Four new fair-trade supporters won Senate seats, a net change of four. The report includes trade positions for candidates in over 130 competitive or open seat races. Public Citizen found that in 2008, campaigning on fair trade was not solely a Democratic tactic. More than a dozen incumbent and open-seat fair-trade Republicans beat back tough primary and general election challenges by campaigning on a fair-trade platform, including with paid ads. In a dozen competitive and open seat races, both the Republican and the Democrat competed in an “anti-NAFTA off,” battling to be the most critical of the status-quo trade model.
The election electoral gains for fair-traders mark the second phase (following a 37-seat net gain by fair-traders in 2006) of an unprecedented shift in the U.S. political landscape away from the disastrous trade and globalization policies of the past,” said Todd Tucker, research director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division. “The American public expects a serious debate around replacing the current model.”
The American Public is AGAINST so called Free-Trade. They want Fair-Trade.
Right now, neither the Democrat or Republican party is Championing the Protectionist Dogma.
However, as this past election shows, more Democrats are at least "saying" they are against NAFTA and all the Free-Trade Garbage. I don't know if they really mean it, but they are saying the right thing.
Some Republicans are starting to get on board the Protectionist, Fair-Trade Bus. Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo both blasted Free-Trade agreements during the Primary Election.
But we still have many "Free-Traders" in high positions in the Republican Party, i.e. John McCain.
However, Free-Trade is a LOSING ISSUE, not to mention a horrible policy that is sucking the lifeblood from our American Workers who have to compete against slave labor in China paying .40 cents/hr.
Here is what Republicans should do: Starting TODAY form a new Platform saying NO MORE NAFTA, NO MORE CAFTA, No more Free-Trade deals.
The Republican party needs to run on a MANUFACTURING theme in addition to a conservative social policy.
In my next blog I will reveal the main themes the Republican Party needs to Run on ASAP.
It is what I consider another Contract with America (although I would name it something different).
Jimbo
From the presidency to both chambers of Congress and from traditionally “free trade” Florida to Colorado and New York to New Mexico, successful candidates in 2008 election races ran on a platform of fundamental overhaul of U.S. trade and globalization policies including a growing number of Republicans, with a net increase in Congress of at least 30 fair trade supporters, according to the new report “Fair Trade Gets an Upgrade” by Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division. The number of fair-trade pick-ups in Congress may increase depending on the results of several races not yet called.
“The 2008 election was a veritable tipping point for fair-trade issues, which just reinforces what polls have increasingly shown: The public has had it with the current race-to-the-bottom trade and globalization model, and they voted against those who support it and for those who say they will replace it,” said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division. “Public expectations after this trade-focused election create pressure to fix the existing trade agreements and policies while further marginalizing various Bush hangover proposals, such as an expansion of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to Colombia, a bilateral investment treaty with China, and more financial service liberalization through the Korea Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization (WTO) Doha Round.”
A total of 33 new fair-traders won seats in the House of Representatives, which represents a net change of 26. Four new fair-trade supporters won Senate seats, a net change of four. The report includes trade positions for candidates in over 130 competitive or open seat races. Public Citizen found that in 2008, campaigning on fair trade was not solely a Democratic tactic. More than a dozen incumbent and open-seat fair-trade Republicans beat back tough primary and general election challenges by campaigning on a fair-trade platform, including with paid ads. In a dozen competitive and open seat races, both the Republican and the Democrat competed in an “anti-NAFTA off,” battling to be the most critical of the status-quo trade model.
The election electoral gains for fair-traders mark the second phase (following a 37-seat net gain by fair-traders in 2006) of an unprecedented shift in the U.S. political landscape away from the disastrous trade and globalization policies of the past,” said Todd Tucker, research director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division. “The American public expects a serious debate around replacing the current model.”
The American Public is AGAINST so called Free-Trade. They want Fair-Trade.
Right now, neither the Democrat or Republican party is Championing the Protectionist Dogma.
However, as this past election shows, more Democrats are at least "saying" they are against NAFTA and all the Free-Trade Garbage. I don't know if they really mean it, but they are saying the right thing.
Some Republicans are starting to get on board the Protectionist, Fair-Trade Bus. Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo both blasted Free-Trade agreements during the Primary Election.
But we still have many "Free-Traders" in high positions in the Republican Party, i.e. John McCain.
However, Free-Trade is a LOSING ISSUE, not to mention a horrible policy that is sucking the lifeblood from our American Workers who have to compete against slave labor in China paying .40 cents/hr.
Here is what Republicans should do: Starting TODAY form a new Platform saying NO MORE NAFTA, NO MORE CAFTA, No more Free-Trade deals.
The Republican party needs to run on a MANUFACTURING theme in addition to a conservative social policy.
In my next blog I will reveal the main themes the Republican Party needs to Run on ASAP.
It is what I consider another Contract with America (although I would name it something different).
Jimbo
NO MORE CHINESE GIFTS PLEASE
I lead our Church's AWANA program each Wednesday night.
In the past, I have given out CHEAP CHINESE TOYS to the winning team.
About 1/3rd of the stuff was broken, garbage.
This year, I decided enough is enough.
So I now hand out cold hard CASH $$. instead.
The kids LOVE IT.
I feel as though I am doing one small thing to defy China and our horrible free trade policy with them.
I ABSOLUTELY HATE the fact that almost NO TOYS ARE MADE IN THE USA.
We are outsourcing everything, toys, calculators, phones, electronics, clothes, containers, microwaves, power tools, vacuum cleaners, fans, Christmas lights, appliances, medical supplies, baseballs. The list is actually so long it is unbelievable.
I can't stop buying everything from China because almost EVERYTHING is made in China.
But the less I can buy from China the better.
I urge all of you to do your part in supporting USA manufacturers.
As much as you can, stop buying Cheap Chinese Crap.
Jimbo
In the past, I have given out CHEAP CHINESE TOYS to the winning team.
About 1/3rd of the stuff was broken, garbage.
This year, I decided enough is enough.
So I now hand out cold hard CASH $$. instead.
The kids LOVE IT.
I feel as though I am doing one small thing to defy China and our horrible free trade policy with them.
I ABSOLUTELY HATE the fact that almost NO TOYS ARE MADE IN THE USA.
We are outsourcing everything, toys, calculators, phones, electronics, clothes, containers, microwaves, power tools, vacuum cleaners, fans, Christmas lights, appliances, medical supplies, baseballs. The list is actually so long it is unbelievable.
I can't stop buying everything from China because almost EVERYTHING is made in China.
But the less I can buy from China the better.
I urge all of you to do your part in supporting USA manufacturers.
As much as you can, stop buying Cheap Chinese Crap.
Jimbo
So many Things to Be Thankful For this Thanksgiving
There are so many things to be thankful for this Thanksgiving.
I am thankful for my wonderful family.
My Son-Calvin
My Daughter-Amber
My Daughter-Kayla
My Beautiful Wife-Faye
I am thankful for my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ (God in the Flesh). He is the Savior not only of me, but of the ENTIRE WORLD.
I am thankful that I can worship Jesus freely (so far at least) in this Country (USA).
I am thankful for my Parents, Pastor Nick and Patricia for raising me up in a loving, Christian home.
I am thankful for my Wife's Parents, Dr. Felizardo Belga and Yolli Belga, for always being there to support me and my family.
I am thankful for my health (even though I am about 30lbs. overweight).
I am thankful that my whole immediate family is healthy as well.
I am thankful that I have a job that allows my wife to stay at home and raise our 3 wonderful children.
I am thankful for so many other things that would clog up this blog site.
So if you are wondering what to thank God for this Thanksgiving period, I have named a few things above to get you started.
Jimbo
I am thankful for my wonderful family.
My Son-Calvin
My Daughter-Amber
My Daughter-Kayla
My Beautiful Wife-Faye
I am thankful for my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ (God in the Flesh). He is the Savior not only of me, but of the ENTIRE WORLD.
I am thankful that I can worship Jesus freely (so far at least) in this Country (USA).
I am thankful for my Parents, Pastor Nick and Patricia for raising me up in a loving, Christian home.
I am thankful for my Wife's Parents, Dr. Felizardo Belga and Yolli Belga, for always being there to support me and my family.
I am thankful for my health (even though I am about 30lbs. overweight).
I am thankful that my whole immediate family is healthy as well.
I am thankful that I have a job that allows my wife to stay at home and raise our 3 wonderful children.
I am thankful for so many other things that would clog up this blog site.
So if you are wondering what to thank God for this Thanksgiving period, I have named a few things above to get you started.
Jimbo
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Go See BOLT. Great Family Movie.
From time to time I talk about things other than just political.This is that time.
Today, me and my family saw the movie, BOLT.
This is a heartwarming, family friendly, dog loving, happy ending movie. There is no swear words. There is no sexual joking or jesting. It is FUNNY FUNNY FUNNY.
I rate BOLT a 10/10 for a family friendly movie. It is rated PG. However, I would have rated it G.
By the way, the Theatre was jammed packed. This goes to show you, a family friendly movie will make money and it doesn't need to be dirty.
So go see BOLT. You won't be disappointed.
http://disney.go.com/disneypictures/bolt/
Jimbo
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Obama "Chooses" Fancy Private School for kids, but No "Choice" for the Poor People of D.C.
This week, President elect, Obama, chose, The Sidwell Friends School in Washington D.C. for his two daughters.
It is a posh, high class school where ONLY THE RICH NEED APPLY.
It is great that Obama gets to choose this superb school for his daughters.
The price tag is around $30,000 EACH. That is a grand total of $60,000 for school for his two daughters.
However, the poor people of Washington D.C. get NO CHOICE in where they can send their children to school. They are STUCK sending their kids to Gang-ridden, Drug-Infested, Poor-Academic Schools in D.C.
Barack Obama DOES NOT think "they" should have the CHOICE. Even though he has Plenty of Choice. Obama says, if you don't have the money that I do, then too bad, too sad. YOU MUST send your kid to the local Public School, no matter how bad it is.
What a hypocrite. Obama thinks women should have plenty of "choice" when it comes to killing their baby in the womb, but NO SCHOOL CHOICE FOR THE PEOPLE OF D.C.
If Obama REALLY were for the poor and down and out people of D.C., he would give them a voucher, worth say, 30K for each child, that they can use for School for their kids. Then they can have the same CHOICE as He has.
I thought Obama wanted to help the poor and down and out. I guess its all talk. Figures.
Obama is a typical ELITIST.
What is an ELITIST?
It is one who says, "You Poor People are Not as Good as Me." "I am better than You because I am RICH and you are not." "I also know better than you how to educate your kids, because I'm smart and you are dumb." "So don't talk back to me, just shut up and oh, vote for me too."
Class act, this Obama guy huh? NOT!
Jimbo
It is a posh, high class school where ONLY THE RICH NEED APPLY.
It is great that Obama gets to choose this superb school for his daughters.
The price tag is around $30,000 EACH. That is a grand total of $60,000 for school for his two daughters.
However, the poor people of Washington D.C. get NO CHOICE in where they can send their children to school. They are STUCK sending their kids to Gang-ridden, Drug-Infested, Poor-Academic Schools in D.C.
Barack Obama DOES NOT think "they" should have the CHOICE. Even though he has Plenty of Choice. Obama says, if you don't have the money that I do, then too bad, too sad. YOU MUST send your kid to the local Public School, no matter how bad it is.
What a hypocrite. Obama thinks women should have plenty of "choice" when it comes to killing their baby in the womb, but NO SCHOOL CHOICE FOR THE PEOPLE OF D.C.
If Obama REALLY were for the poor and down and out people of D.C., he would give them a voucher, worth say, 30K for each child, that they can use for School for their kids. Then they can have the same CHOICE as He has.
I thought Obama wanted to help the poor and down and out. I guess its all talk. Figures.
Obama is a typical ELITIST.
What is an ELITIST?
It is one who says, "You Poor People are Not as Good as Me." "I am better than You because I am RICH and you are not." "I also know better than you how to educate your kids, because I'm smart and you are dumb." "So don't talk back to me, just shut up and oh, vote for me too."
Class act, this Obama guy huh? NOT!
Jimbo
Monday, November 17, 2008
God-Haters Come Out in Full Force Against Christmas.
The God Haters, Atheists, Secular Humanists, Social Left Wing Idiots have come out in Full Force already for the Christmas season.
This Idiotic group, the American Humanist Association, is spending 40K on stupid ads to run on Washington, D.C. buses, saying, "Why believe in God, just be good for goodness' sake".
Watch as Bill Donohue of the Catholic League takes this joker, Jesse Galef, to task and gives him an oral spanking.
Donohue rips this clown to shreds, bringing out the point that it is ONLY because of the Judeo-Christian Values of this Country that this idiot is even allowed to voice his stupid opinion.
If Jesse here, tried to voice his opinion (that was against the majority) in a country like North Korea, he'd be thrown in prison. Now groups like the American Humanist Association want to kick God out of Christmas.
Notice however, that this group does not go after Muslims on Ramadan.
This is because this group has a SPECIFIC AGENDA ONLY AGAINST CHRISTIANS. It is a Spiritual Battle going on here, between God and Satan. Make no mistake about it.
We as Christians must fight back like Bill Donohue did here, against evil forces like the American Humanist Association, the ACLU, and the Americans for Separation of Church and State.
These are Godless, Hate filled organizations. Stand up and fight against them. Say Merry Christmas everywhere you go.
Jimbo
This Idiotic group, the American Humanist Association, is spending 40K on stupid ads to run on Washington, D.C. buses, saying, "Why believe in God, just be good for goodness' sake".
Watch as Bill Donohue of the Catholic League takes this joker, Jesse Galef, to task and gives him an oral spanking.
Donohue rips this clown to shreds, bringing out the point that it is ONLY because of the Judeo-Christian Values of this Country that this idiot is even allowed to voice his stupid opinion.
If Jesse here, tried to voice his opinion (that was against the majority) in a country like North Korea, he'd be thrown in prison. Now groups like the American Humanist Association want to kick God out of Christmas.
Notice however, that this group does not go after Muslims on Ramadan.
This is because this group has a SPECIFIC AGENDA ONLY AGAINST CHRISTIANS. It is a Spiritual Battle going on here, between God and Satan. Make no mistake about it.
We as Christians must fight back like Bill Donohue did here, against evil forces like the American Humanist Association, the ACLU, and the Americans for Separation of Church and State.
These are Godless, Hate filled organizations. Stand up and fight against them. Say Merry Christmas everywhere you go.
Jimbo
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Hate Filled Gay Mafia Strike Old Lady's Cross and Push Her around!
The Gay Mafia is Mad.
Why?
Because the good people of California voted YES on Prop. 8. Which simply says the obvious. Marriage is between a MAN and WOMAN. This is easy to understand, right?
But the Gay Mafia says No, Marriage is between a Man and a Man or a Woman and a Woman.
To this I say, Whaaaa??
Thank God Prop. 8 passed in California on Election day.
Even though there was millions of $$ + Hollywood Celebrities fighting tooth and nail against it, it still passed.
And now the Gay Mafia is Pissed off. They are REALLY pissed off at Evangelicals.
You see this whole thing is a Spiritual battle of the forces of Godliness vs. Satanic forces.
Homosexuality is a perversion of the worst kind. It says basically to God, F_ _ K you.
The Hate is on the Gay Mafia's side. They are filled with Hate. They Hate God. They Hate Religious people, Religious institutions.
They especially Hate ANYBODY WHO SAYS THEIR LIFESTYLE IS WRONG.
Watch their Hate in action here:
Now at the end of that video, you hear the anchor man saying "There is a lot of hate about this on BOTH SIDES".
Uh, I'm sorry but I see Hate ONLY ON ONE SIDE. This is Crystal Clear. It is on the Gay Mafia side only.
The elderly lady, who by the way has lived in Palm Springs for 30yrs, was PEACEFULLY holding a Cross. However, the Violent Gay Mafia, who were younger and bigger, were BULLYING her and SPITTING on her.
Now the good thing is, this shows the moderates out there, how extreme and hateful the so-called loving homosexual movement really is.
We as proponents of traditional family values and traditional marriage MUST stay vigilant, in order to keep the Gay Mafia from imposing their hate filled doctrine on us all.
Thank God for elderly ladies standing up for what is right.
Jimbo
Why?
Because the good people of California voted YES on Prop. 8. Which simply says the obvious. Marriage is between a MAN and WOMAN. This is easy to understand, right?
But the Gay Mafia says No, Marriage is between a Man and a Man or a Woman and a Woman.
To this I say, Whaaaa??
Thank God Prop. 8 passed in California on Election day.
Even though there was millions of $$ + Hollywood Celebrities fighting tooth and nail against it, it still passed.
And now the Gay Mafia is Pissed off. They are REALLY pissed off at Evangelicals.
You see this whole thing is a Spiritual battle of the forces of Godliness vs. Satanic forces.
Homosexuality is a perversion of the worst kind. It says basically to God, F_ _ K you.
The Hate is on the Gay Mafia's side. They are filled with Hate. They Hate God. They Hate Religious people, Religious institutions.
They especially Hate ANYBODY WHO SAYS THEIR LIFESTYLE IS WRONG.
Watch their Hate in action here:
Now at the end of that video, you hear the anchor man saying "There is a lot of hate about this on BOTH SIDES".
Uh, I'm sorry but I see Hate ONLY ON ONE SIDE. This is Crystal Clear. It is on the Gay Mafia side only.
The elderly lady, who by the way has lived in Palm Springs for 30yrs, was PEACEFULLY holding a Cross. However, the Violent Gay Mafia, who were younger and bigger, were BULLYING her and SPITTING on her.
Now the good thing is, this shows the moderates out there, how extreme and hateful the so-called loving homosexual movement really is.
We as proponents of traditional family values and traditional marriage MUST stay vigilant, in order to keep the Gay Mafia from imposing their hate filled doctrine on us all.
Thank God for elderly ladies standing up for what is right.
Jimbo
Monday, November 10, 2008
Disgruntled Obama Campaign Workers--Watch this!
This is hilarious.
Here, Obama speaks about "paying a livable wage", about "fairness", about helping out "main street and and the "down and out".
Yet, as you will clearly see here in this video, the Obama campaign shortchanges its OWN CAMPAIGN WORKERS.
"This is outright fraud", says one disgruntled Obama campaign worker.
"Just come on with my currency", says another irate Obama campaign worker.
"This just ain't right", complains another mad Obama campaign worker.
Police had to be called in to settle the angry crowd.
Why? Because the Obama campaign doesn't want to pay its workers what they are owed.
Also, what about these people's health insurance? Why didn't Obama pay for that?
What about a pension for Obama's campaign workers??
Oh, that's right, Obama thinks only "Other Business owners" need to pay pensions, livable wages, health insurance.
What a hypocrite.
Watch the video now:
The Obama campaign says they will "try" to compensate those who were shortchanged.
I'm sorry but, TRY?? Trying is not good enough.
Pay these people their currency! Come on with the currency!
Obama raked in a record $600 million in campaign cash, now COME ON WITH THE CURRENCY!
Jimbo
Here, Obama speaks about "paying a livable wage", about "fairness", about helping out "main street and and the "down and out".
Yet, as you will clearly see here in this video, the Obama campaign shortchanges its OWN CAMPAIGN WORKERS.
"This is outright fraud", says one disgruntled Obama campaign worker.
"Just come on with my currency", says another irate Obama campaign worker.
"This just ain't right", complains another mad Obama campaign worker.
Police had to be called in to settle the angry crowd.
Why? Because the Obama campaign doesn't want to pay its workers what they are owed.
Also, what about these people's health insurance? Why didn't Obama pay for that?
What about a pension for Obama's campaign workers??
Oh, that's right, Obama thinks only "Other Business owners" need to pay pensions, livable wages, health insurance.
What a hypocrite.
Watch the video now:
The Obama campaign says they will "try" to compensate those who were shortchanged.
I'm sorry but, TRY?? Trying is not good enough.
Pay these people their currency! Come on with the currency!
Obama raked in a record $600 million in campaign cash, now COME ON WITH THE CURRENCY!
Jimbo
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Obama in. Gay Marriage Out
Well, this LONG Presidential election is Finally Over. Thank God. Now I can get on with my Life.
Of course I am disappointed, because disagree with Obama on so many VERY important Social Issues. However, McCain is NOT a Culture warrior, and he is a Big Free Trader(which is killing millions of jobs here in the USA). But, McCain was the lesser of two evils in my mind.
Hopefully Obama won't repeal DOMA (defense of marriage act) passed by Bill Clinton.
Hopefully Obama won't push for the Freedom of Choice Act (this act will get rid of ALL sane-minded abortion restrictions like parental notification, and 24hr waiting periods.
It would mean 24hr, 7day a week ABORTION ON DEMAND with NO RESTRICTIONS AT ALL.
Christians, we need to get on our knees and pray that President Obama has an Apostle Paul experience and really sees the light on Abortion and Homosexuality.
Now is not the time for Evangelical Christians to shrink away from the debate on Abortion and Homosexuality. We MUST Pray more for God to intervene while at the same time pushing for restrictions on abortion and upholding Marriage between One Man and One Woman.
Hopefully Obama will not destroy all those Coal Plants like he promised to do, by enacting severe cap and trade greenhouse gas laws which will effectively Bankrupt these Coal Plants meaning millions of lost jobs.
Now for the good news.
In California, Proposition 8 passed and that means NO MORE GAY MARRIAGE. Marriage is Now defined as One Man and One Woman. Pro-Traditional Marriage ballot measures passed in Arizona and Florida by large margins.
70% of the African Americans in California voted Yes on Prop. 8 even though 95% of them voted for Obama. Thank God for these ballot measures and all the hard work involved with getting this to Win.
I am saddened that South Dakota and Colorado lost their Abortion ballot measures.
Don't people understand that LITTLE BABIES in the WOMB are the MOST VULNERABLE and thereby need the MOST PROTECTION??? I just don't get it.
What about the Baby's Choice, Huh??
This is why we must continue to Pray that God will open people's eyes and change their hearts from a heart of stone to a heart of love for little babies.
Pray America, Pray.
Jimbo
Of course I am disappointed, because disagree with Obama on so many VERY important Social Issues. However, McCain is NOT a Culture warrior, and he is a Big Free Trader(which is killing millions of jobs here in the USA). But, McCain was the lesser of two evils in my mind.
Hopefully Obama won't repeal DOMA (defense of marriage act) passed by Bill Clinton.
Hopefully Obama won't push for the Freedom of Choice Act (this act will get rid of ALL sane-minded abortion restrictions like parental notification, and 24hr waiting periods.
It would mean 24hr, 7day a week ABORTION ON DEMAND with NO RESTRICTIONS AT ALL.
Christians, we need to get on our knees and pray that President Obama has an Apostle Paul experience and really sees the light on Abortion and Homosexuality.
Now is not the time for Evangelical Christians to shrink away from the debate on Abortion and Homosexuality. We MUST Pray more for God to intervene while at the same time pushing for restrictions on abortion and upholding Marriage between One Man and One Woman.
Hopefully Obama will not destroy all those Coal Plants like he promised to do, by enacting severe cap and trade greenhouse gas laws which will effectively Bankrupt these Coal Plants meaning millions of lost jobs.
Now for the good news.
In California, Proposition 8 passed and that means NO MORE GAY MARRIAGE. Marriage is Now defined as One Man and One Woman. Pro-Traditional Marriage ballot measures passed in Arizona and Florida by large margins.
70% of the African Americans in California voted Yes on Prop. 8 even though 95% of them voted for Obama. Thank God for these ballot measures and all the hard work involved with getting this to Win.
I am saddened that South Dakota and Colorado lost their Abortion ballot measures.
Don't people understand that LITTLE BABIES in the WOMB are the MOST VULNERABLE and thereby need the MOST PROTECTION??? I just don't get it.
What about the Baby's Choice, Huh??
This is why we must continue to Pray that God will open people's eyes and change their hearts from a heart of stone to a heart of love for little babies.
Pray America, Pray.
Jimbo
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Obama "I will Bankrupt ALL Coal Plants". Are you listening Pennsylvania, Colorado, Virginia, Ohio?
New Shocking Video from January that He told the San Francisco Chronicle.
Barack Obama PROMISES to BANKRUPT Coal Plants if He becomes President.
Hear that Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Indiana. If these plants go bankrupt, MILLIONS of People will LOSE their Jobs.
Well, I guess they can always apply for a job at the Obama 2012 campaign.
Here it is People, in Obama's own words:
Imagine if John McCain had whispered somewhere that he was willing to bankrupt a major industry?
Would this declaration not immediately be front page news?
Well, Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview.
The result? Nothing. This audio interview has been hidden from the public...until now.
Here is the transcript of Obama's statement about bankrupting the coal industry.
"Let me sort of describe my overall policy."
"What I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there."
"I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year."
"So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted."
Barack Obama PROMISES to BANKRUPT Coal Plants if He becomes President.
Hear that Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Indiana. If these plants go bankrupt, MILLIONS of People will LOSE their Jobs.
Well, I guess they can always apply for a job at the Obama 2012 campaign.
Here it is People, in Obama's own words:
Imagine if John McCain had whispered somewhere that he was willing to bankrupt a major industry?
Would this declaration not immediately be front page news?
Well, Barack Obama actually flat out told the San Francisco Chronicle (SF Gate) that he was willing to see the coal industry go bankrupt in a January 17, 2008 interview.
The result? Nothing. This audio interview has been hidden from the public...until now.
Here is the transcript of Obama's statement about bankrupting the coal industry.
"Let me sort of describe my overall policy."
"What I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there."
"I was the first to call for a 100% auction on the cap and trade system, which means that every unit of carbon or greenhouse gases emitted would be charged to the polluter. That will create a market in which whatever technologies are out there that are being presented, whatever power plants that are being built, that they would have to meet the rigors of that market and the ratcheted down caps that are being placed, imposed every year."
"So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted."
That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.
The only thing I've said with respect to coal, I haven't been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.
So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.It's just that it will bankrupt them.
There you heard it. Obama wants to bankrupt a Major US industry. And why? Because Obama is beholden to the Radical Environmental Mafia. He cares more for them than middle class America's Jobs.
Once again Shame on Barack Hussein Obama.
If McCain is smart, he will flood TV and Radio airwaves with this crucial information.
Jimbo
Friday, October 31, 2008
Obama Still Won't help his Own Poor Aunt after making 4.2 Million
Found in a rundown Boston estate: Barack Obama’s aunt Zeituni Onyango.Shame Shame Shame on Barack Hussein Obama once again. Obama made 4.2 million bucks last year, yet here his Aunt suffers in Poverty in Boston.
Remember my earlier blog about Obama not even supporting his own Brother, George Obama, who continues to live in a straw hut on 1$/month.
Yet, we are supposed to believe he really "cares" for the middle class.
Gimmie a break.
Obama loves to preach to others about being their brother's keeper. Yet, his beloved aunt is living in a Boston slum, and his half-brother lives in a hut in Africa. I guess it's okay for Obama to spread the wealth around, as long as it's not his.
A second relative believed to be the long-lost "Uncle Omar" described in Obama's book was beaten by armed robbers with a "sawed-off rifle" while working in a corner shop in the Dorchester area of the city. He was later evicted from his one-bedroom apartment for failing to pay $2,324.20 in bills, according to the Boston Housing Court.
Yet once again, Obama says he "cares" for the downtrodden. Yea right.
So much of Obama's desire to spread the wealth ... but then, it's not HIS wealth he wants to spread.
Obama could CARE LESS about the American People, INCLUDING his own relatives. He is in it for himself ONLY.
What a joke. But the joke's on you IF you support Barack Hussein Obama.
Say NO to Obamanation.
Jimbo
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Christian Radio, Conservative Talk Radio may be SHUT DOWN under Obama
In August 1987, the FCC abolished the "Fairness doctrine" by a 4-0 vote, in the Syracuse Peace Council decision, which was upheld by the Appeals Court for the D.C. Circuit in February 1989
However, if Obama is elected President, he will re-enact the "fairness doctrine".
This sounds nice, right? WRONG
The fairness doctrine MANDATES that if you are verbalizing one point of view on your radio station, that you MUST put people on the station with opposing views.
So for example, if a Christian radio station was talking about how Jesus is the way to Heaven, under the so-called fairness doctrine, that Christian radio station would be REQUIRED to put, say, a Muslim point of view on the station, in order to, you know, "be fair".
Since most Christian radio stations wouldn't do that, guess what, THEY WOULD BE SHUT DOWN.
Imagine, Godly Christian radio being SHUT DOWN in the USA!
With a Democratic majority this "fairness doctrine" would sail through Congress and the Senate and become the LAW OF THE LAND.
The same thing for Conservative talk radio would happen as well. They would be FORCED to put a Liberal on the Station.
Understand this. Right now Conservative talk radio helps to balance out the overwhelming Liberal media which is pervasive all over TV, from newscasts to Hollywood.
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is not "fair" at all.
This is anti-free speech.
This is Communism. This is Totalitarianism. This is DEAD WRONG.
Jimbo
However, if Obama is elected President, he will re-enact the "fairness doctrine".
This sounds nice, right? WRONG
The fairness doctrine MANDATES that if you are verbalizing one point of view on your radio station, that you MUST put people on the station with opposing views.
So for example, if a Christian radio station was talking about how Jesus is the way to Heaven, under the so-called fairness doctrine, that Christian radio station would be REQUIRED to put, say, a Muslim point of view on the station, in order to, you know, "be fair".
Since most Christian radio stations wouldn't do that, guess what, THEY WOULD BE SHUT DOWN.
Imagine, Godly Christian radio being SHUT DOWN in the USA!
With a Democratic majority this "fairness doctrine" would sail through Congress and the Senate and become the LAW OF THE LAND.
The same thing for Conservative talk radio would happen as well. They would be FORCED to put a Liberal on the Station.
Understand this. Right now Conservative talk radio helps to balance out the overwhelming Liberal media which is pervasive all over TV, from newscasts to Hollywood.
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is not "fair" at all.
This is anti-free speech.
This is Communism. This is Totalitarianism. This is DEAD WRONG.
Jimbo
Friday, October 24, 2008
Biden says, Expect a 9-11 attack if Obama becomes President
That's right, Joe Biden says, "Expect a 9-11 type attack when Obama becomes President".
That's comforting, right?
Say it ain't so Joe once again.
Here it is:
All I can say is, "Thanks for the warning Joe".
The question you have to ask yourselves is; Do we want to INVITE another 9-11 terrorist attack on the USA?
I say a resounding NO.
Joe Biden is essentially saying, "Come on, Osama Bin Laden, let's see what you got.
Let me remind all voters; the PRIMARY job of the President is to KEEP US SAFE, not invite a terrorist attack, like 9-11.
So if you want another 9-11 terrorist type attack, then vote for Barack Hussein Obama.
Jimbo
That's comforting, right?
Say it ain't so Joe once again.
Here it is:
All I can say is, "Thanks for the warning Joe".
The question you have to ask yourselves is; Do we want to INVITE another 9-11 terrorist attack on the USA?
I say a resounding NO.
Joe Biden is essentially saying, "Come on, Osama Bin Laden, let's see what you got.
Let me remind all voters; the PRIMARY job of the President is to KEEP US SAFE, not invite a terrorist attack, like 9-11.
So if you want another 9-11 terrorist type attack, then vote for Barack Hussein Obama.
Jimbo
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Famous Latin Actor Eduardo Verastegui wants to Expose Obama's Radical Anti-Life Record
The rising star of the hit movie Bella, Eduardo Verastegui,, is launching a campaign to publicize the anti-family elements of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama plans for the United States, should be become president.Thank God, there are some in the Acting community that know what is just, what is right.
Verastegui has been called the "Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Mel Gibson of Latin America."
Verastegui, 34, became famous singing in the popular Mexican band "KAIRO" and acting in "Telenovelas" (Latin-American soap operas). He was recently voted by People Magazine en Español as one of the 50 Most Beautiful People in the world. His movie, BELLA, won the 2006 Toronto Film Festival People's Choice Award.
Now he's working with the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee (CWALAC) on an "eye-opening" video called "Dura Realidad/Hard Truth," which can be seen online.
It includes graphic image of babies who lost their lives through abortion procedures.
And it is intended to shock, in order to spur action that would change the culture of accepting abortion as a medical procedure.
Verastegui called Obama's pursuit of "insane anti-parent laws" unacceptable.
"They allow child molesters to force young girls into secret abortions to cover up their crimes," he says on the video. "It is time to wake up."
One of the most famous Latin stars in the Americas, Verastegui already quietly has been counseling women before they enter abortion clinics by showing this video. Numerous women have decided not to abort their child after watching it.
"Thank goodness Eduardo has the character and courage to go public with this must-see video. Americans need to know the truth about Barack Obama. And with Eduardo as the host, these online videos will spread like wildfire," said Wendy Wright, president of the CWALAC.
Obama has sought to cast his abortion voting record as moderate, but as WND has reported, it sometimes has gone beyond what even the National Abortion Rights Action League has desired.
WND earlier reported on transcripts of Obama's statements during his tenure in the Illinois state legislature revealing his support for what amounts to infanticide.
Arguing against the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act in 2002, after even Planned Parenthood had dropped its opposition, Obama expressed concern that the bill might burden abortionists, reported blogger Erick Erickson on RedState.com.
According to the transcript, Obama said:
As I understand it, this puts the burden on the attending physician who has determined, since they were performing this procedure, that, in fact, this is a nonviable fetus; that if that fetus, or child – however way you want to describe it – is now outside the mother's womb and the doctor continues to think that it's nonviable but there's, let's say, movement or some indication that, in fact, they're not just coming out limp and dead, that, in fact, they would then have to call a second physician to monitor and check off and make sure that this is not a live child that could be saved.
Amazing. Obama calls a newborn baby an IT!
WND also reported an ad by the Obama campaign that attacked an abortion survivor.
Obama's commercial took shots at the GOP campaign, calling McCain's ads "the sleaziest ever, truly vile." But when the screen showed clips of abortion survivor Gianna Jessen and the ad she made asking Obama to reverse his stance on born alive infant protection legislation, the Obama ad calls Jessen's appeal "a despicable lie."
Lie? The ONLY one Lying is OBAMA. What a jerk. Obama is PURE SCUM.
The attack on Jessen has angered pro-life advocates.
"It is despicable, repulsive and beneath contempt that Barack Obama would attack Gianna Jessen," said Stanek in a statement on Jessen's website. "She is a courageous abortion survivor and living miracle who would not be with us today if Obama's policies had been in place when she was born."
Thankfully, Eduardo Verastegui is now helping families in this fight against Obama and his insane infanticide.
Jimbo
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Stupid Joe Biden can't Count 4 letter Word!
This is hilarious. Joe Biden acts all smug. Joe Biden acts as if he is smarter than you and me.
Let's see how smart Joe Biden really is.
Watch this:
HA HA HA!
Joe Biden thinks Jobs is a 3 letter word. What an idiot.
Hey Joe, let me tell you, in case you flunked Kindergarten, JOBS is a 4 letter word.
J-O-B-S. That is 4 letters, not 3 Joe.
Say it ain't so Joe, but you really blow.
This guy Joe Biden, acts as if he is smarter than the average citizen. He is an elitist.
Imagine if Sarah Palin did this. She would have been crucified on the nightly news.
It is time we elect a SMART Vice President. hint. NOT JOE BIDEN.
Jimbo
Let's see how smart Joe Biden really is.
Watch this:
HA HA HA!
Joe Biden thinks Jobs is a 3 letter word. What an idiot.
Hey Joe, let me tell you, in case you flunked Kindergarten, JOBS is a 4 letter word.
J-O-B-S. That is 4 letters, not 3 Joe.
Say it ain't so Joe, but you really blow.
This guy Joe Biden, acts as if he is smarter than the average citizen. He is an elitist.
Imagine if Sarah Palin did this. She would have been crucified on the nightly news.
It is time we elect a SMART Vice President. hint. NOT JOE BIDEN.
Jimbo
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Obama as President = More Terrorism, More Infanticide, More Perverts, Less Free Speech
That is what you will get with an Obama Presidency.
1. More Terrorism.
Barack Hussein Obama wants to have a pizza and beer with the leader of Iran (Iran being a government supporting terrorists. Obama has repeatedly said that he wants to meet with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad WITHOUT any preconditions. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the leader of Iran who has continually stated that he wants to wipe Israel off the map. Yet Obama wants to sit down with him and have a pizza and beer. This would be a slap in the face to Israel, who is our ally. In fact, right now Yasser Arafat, the former Palestinian leader, is working the phones to help get Obama elected. Osama wants Obama President because he knows that Obama won't go after him like George Bush did.
2. More Infanticide.
I have blogged on this before. When Obama was in the Illinois Senate, he voted 3 times against the born-alive infant protection act. This act says that if a baby is born ALIVE from a botched abortion, that basic medical care must be given to that baby. Barack Hussein Obama said NO WAY to this born-alive infant protection act. Fortunately, this act passed on a Federal level WITHOUT Obama's roadblock. Shame on Barack Hussein Obama. Even all the liberal Senators voted for this act. But not Barack.
3. More Perverts.
Essentially what I mean is if Obama is elected President, we will have in the White House, a man who is FOREVER BEHOLDEN to the Radical Homosexual Mafia. These people are RIGHT now in different parts of the country, FORCING KINDERGARTNERS to embrace Homosexual Sex education. Obama voted in the Illinois Senate FOR this kind of perversion. Obama most likely force Homosexual Marriage on a Federal level across the whole USA. I guess Obama doesn't really read his Bible.
4. Less Free Speech.
If Obama is elected President, he will enact the "fairness doctrine". This is a horrible policy that basically will ERADICATE CONSERVATIVE TALK RADIO. That's right, make no mistake about this. Also, if you as a Pastor, speak out against Homosexuality, that will be considered a HATE CRIME and your church will be fined or even worse, shut down, and the Pastor will be thrown in jail. You think that this could not happen in the USA, THINK AGAIN.
So there you go, all you people out there who are planning on voting for Obama. This is what you will get.
Stop Obama now, before it is too late.
NOBAMA NOW.
Jimbo
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Barack Hussein Obama- NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!
On August, 21, 2008, prominent lawyer, Hillary supporter, former Pennsylvania Democratic Party official and former Pennsylvania Deputy Attorney General Philip J. Berg, filed a suit in Federal court in Philadelphia alleging that, because of several factual situations, Obama is not a “natural born citizen” as the Constitution requires all candidates for President to be (see http://obamacrimes.com/) and he uses as proof, among other things, the testimony of Obama’s paternal grandmother, a half-brother and half sister who say they witnessed that Obama was born, not in Hawaii as Obama claims, but in Kenya.
Most of these allegations could instantly be proven false if Obama were to produce the original, long form copy of his Hawaiian birth certificate for examination. Obama has consistently refused to do this and, instead, Obama’s campaign website and his online supporters have offered images of a shorter Hawaiian “certificate of live birth,” that many questioned documents experts say is a forgery and, doesn’t definitively answer the question anyway.
Now, in legal motions filed in Federal court by attorneys for Obama and the DNC this past Monday, October 6th, Obama and the DNC request that any “discovery” in this case, i.e. the actual production and examination of Obama’s original Hawaiian birth certificate, which Berg alleges does not exist because Obama was born in Kenya, be deferred until other legal issues are settled, in effect, postponing production of the birth certificate in question until after the November 4th Election.
The fact that Obama will not just produce this document—a thing easily done and likely to win him many political points, while at the same time, damaging his political enemies--to settle the issue, and the fact that Obama and the DNC are willing to spend money on delaying production of this original birth certificate, tells me that Obama doesn’t have one, because it doesn’t exist and if it doesn’t exist, Obama is disqualified from running for the Presidency, his campaign collapses and Obama, Democrats in general and the Democratic Party are thoroughly discredited and forever indelibly stained by this monumental fraud on the American people and our country’s democracy; thus, the stakes for Obama, for Democrats, for the Democratic Party and, most importantly, for our democratic form of government, could not be higher. I am sure there is much frantic activity behind the scenes and that the pressure on the Federal judge hearing this case is enormous.
Can you think of any sane reason why Obama would not pull out his original birth certificate for examination and immediately settle this bothersome, costly and “distracting” suit and this controversy? I can’t.
Obama and the DNC are hoping that if Obama wins in November, Obama’s Presidency will be a faite accompli, no one will have the guts or will want to go through the monumental Constitutional Crisis and Crisis in our Legal System that would ensue if attempts were made to remove a Constitutionally disqualified President-designate Obama from his position.
The potential for riots in the streets by Obama’s outraged black supporters (always a threat of implied violence useful to Democrats) is only one of the many dire scenarios one can easily conjure up.
Democrats control Congress and all the chairmen of key committees that would be involved in such a Constitutional Crisis are hard-core Democrats.
The Democrats probably figure that once they win, they can try every trick in the book, they will fix this problem somehow and evade blame, play dumb, throw up a confusing barrage of conflicting information, say that the citizenship requirement is just an archaic “technicality,” unfair and unimportant, point fingers and say they didn’t realize there was a “Crisis,” and can count on most people to not want to “make waves,” “rock the boat,” or to want to be part of such a potentially cataclysmic upheaval endangering the peace and tranquility and the very fabric of our democracy--so, one way or the other--the Democrats will smooth things over and make this suit go away, to enter the Bermuda Triangle of unsolved and endlessly disputed controversies like the disappearance of Judge Crater, Chappaquiddick and the Kennedy Assassination.
So the time to act is NOW. Call for a Real Thorough Investigation of this NOW.
Not after Nov. 4.
Jimbo
Most of these allegations could instantly be proven false if Obama were to produce the original, long form copy of his Hawaiian birth certificate for examination. Obama has consistently refused to do this and, instead, Obama’s campaign website and his online supporters have offered images of a shorter Hawaiian “certificate of live birth,” that many questioned documents experts say is a forgery and, doesn’t definitively answer the question anyway.
Now, in legal motions filed in Federal court by attorneys for Obama and the DNC this past Monday, October 6th, Obama and the DNC request that any “discovery” in this case, i.e. the actual production and examination of Obama’s original Hawaiian birth certificate, which Berg alleges does not exist because Obama was born in Kenya, be deferred until other legal issues are settled, in effect, postponing production of the birth certificate in question until after the November 4th Election.
The fact that Obama will not just produce this document—a thing easily done and likely to win him many political points, while at the same time, damaging his political enemies--to settle the issue, and the fact that Obama and the DNC are willing to spend money on delaying production of this original birth certificate, tells me that Obama doesn’t have one, because it doesn’t exist and if it doesn’t exist, Obama is disqualified from running for the Presidency, his campaign collapses and Obama, Democrats in general and the Democratic Party are thoroughly discredited and forever indelibly stained by this monumental fraud on the American people and our country’s democracy; thus, the stakes for Obama, for Democrats, for the Democratic Party and, most importantly, for our democratic form of government, could not be higher. I am sure there is much frantic activity behind the scenes and that the pressure on the Federal judge hearing this case is enormous.
Can you think of any sane reason why Obama would not pull out his original birth certificate for examination and immediately settle this bothersome, costly and “distracting” suit and this controversy? I can’t.
Obama and the DNC are hoping that if Obama wins in November, Obama’s Presidency will be a faite accompli, no one will have the guts or will want to go through the monumental Constitutional Crisis and Crisis in our Legal System that would ensue if attempts were made to remove a Constitutionally disqualified President-designate Obama from his position.
The potential for riots in the streets by Obama’s outraged black supporters (always a threat of implied violence useful to Democrats) is only one of the many dire scenarios one can easily conjure up.
Democrats control Congress and all the chairmen of key committees that would be involved in such a Constitutional Crisis are hard-core Democrats.
The Democrats probably figure that once they win, they can try every trick in the book, they will fix this problem somehow and evade blame, play dumb, throw up a confusing barrage of conflicting information, say that the citizenship requirement is just an archaic “technicality,” unfair and unimportant, point fingers and say they didn’t realize there was a “Crisis,” and can count on most people to not want to “make waves,” “rock the boat,” or to want to be part of such a potentially cataclysmic upheaval endangering the peace and tranquility and the very fabric of our democracy--so, one way or the other--the Democrats will smooth things over and make this suit go away, to enter the Bermuda Triangle of unsolved and endlessly disputed controversies like the disappearance of Judge Crater, Chappaquiddick and the Kennedy Assassination.
So the time to act is NOW. Call for a Real Thorough Investigation of this NOW.
Not after Nov. 4.
Jimbo
Sunday, October 5, 2008
The Wealth divide and the Growing Gap between the Rich and Everyone else. Here is what to do.
Wealth is the stuff that people own. The main items are your home, other real estate, any small business you own, liquid assets like savings accounts, CDs and money market funds, bonds, other securities, stocks, and the cash surrender value of any life insurance you have. Those are the total assets someone owns. From that, you subtract debts. The main debt is mortgage debt on your home. Other kinds of debt include consumer loans, auto debt and the like. That difference is referred to as net worth, or just wealth.
Wealth — strictly financial savings — provides security to individuals in the event of sickness, job loss or marital separation. Assets provide a kind of safety blanket that people can rely on in case their income gets interrupted.
The most common measure of wealth used, and the most understandable is: what share of total wealth is owned by the richest households, typically the top 1 percent. In the United States, in the last survey year, 1998, the richest 1 percent of households owned 38 percent of all wealth. The average 1% has a net worth of 13 million in the USA.
Here is the Problem.
We have had a fairly sharp increase in wealth inequality dating back to 1975 or 1976.
Prior to that, there was a protracted period when wealth inequality fell in this country, going back almost to 1929. So you have this fairly continuous downward trend from 1929, which of course was the peak of the stock market before it crashed, until just about the mid-1970s. Since then, things have really turned around, and the level of wealth inequality today is almost double what it was in the mid-1970s.
Income inequality has also risen. Most people date this rise to the early 1970s, but it hasn’t gone up nearly as dramatically as wealth inequality.
The top 5 percent own more than half of all wealth.
In 1998, they owned 59 percent of all wealth. Or to put it another way, the top 5 percent had more wealth than the remaining 95 percent of the population, collectively.
The top 20 percent owns over 80 percent of all wealth. In 1998, it owned 83 percent of all wealth.
This is a very concentrated distribution.
The bottom 20 percent basically have zero wealth. They either have no assets, or their debt equals or exceeds their assets. The bottom 20 percent has typically accumulated no savings.
We are much more unequal than any other advanced industrial country.
Perhaps our closest rival in terms of inequality is Great Britain. But where the top percent in this country own 38 percent of all wealth, in Great Britain it is more like 22 or 23 percent.
What is remarkable is that this was not always the case. Up until the early 1970s, the U.S. actually had lower wealth inequality than Great Britain, and even than a country like Sweden. But things have really turned around over the last 25 or 30 years. In fact, a lot of countries have experienced lessening wealth inequality over time. The U.S. is atypical in that inequality has risen so sharply over the last 25 or 30 years.
You may be asking, why should wealth inequality itself be a matter of concern?
I think there are two rationales. The first is basically a moral or ethical position. A lot of people think it is morally bad for there to be wide gaps, wide disparities in well being in a society.
If that is not convincing to a person, the second reason is that inequality is actually harmful to the well-being of a society. There is now a lot of evidence, based on cross-national comparisons of inequality and economic growth, that more unequal societies actually have lower rates of economic growth. The divisiveness that comes out of large disparities in income and wealth, is actually reflected in poorer economic performance of a country.
Typically when countries are more equal, educational achievement and benefits are more equally distributed in the country. In a country like the United States, there are still huge disparities in resources going to education, so quality of schooling and schooling performance are unequal. If you have a society with large concentrations of poor families, average school achievement is usually a lot lower than where you have a much more homogeneous middle class population, as you find in most Western European countries. So schooling suffers in this country, and, as a result, you get a labor force that is less well educated on average than in a country like the Netherlands, Germany or even France. So the high level of inequality results in less human capital being developed in this country, which ultimately affects economic performance.
One reason we have such high levels of inequality, compared to other advanced industrial countries, is because of our tax and, I would add, our social expenditure system. We have much lower taxes than almost every Western European country. And we have a less progressive tax system than almost every Western European country. As a result, the rich in this country manage to retain a much higher share of their income than they do in other countries, and this enables them to accumulate a much higher amount of wealth than the rich in other countries.
We have a much lower level of income support for poor families than do Western European countries or Canada. Social policy in Europe, Canada and Japan does a lot more to reduce economic disparities created by the marketplace than we do in this country. We have much higher poverty rates than do other advanced industrialized countries.
I propose a separate tax on wealth, which actually exists in a dozen European countries. This has helped to lessen inequality in European countries. It is also, I think, a fairer tax. If you think about taxes that reflect a family’s ability to pay, a family’s ability to pay is a reflection of their income, but also of their wealth holdings. A broader kind of tax of this nature, would not only produce more tax revenue, which we desperately need, but it would be a fairer tax, and also help to reduce the level of inequality in this country.
I would model it after the Swiss system, which I think is a pretty fair system. It would be a progressive tax. In the United States, the first $250,000 of wealth would be exempt from the tax. That would exclude 80 percent of all families. The tax would increase at increments, starting out at .2 percent from about $250,000 to $500,000. The marginal rate would go up to .4 percent from $500,000 to $1 million, and then to .6 percent from a $1 million to $5 million, and then to .8 thereafter.
It would not be a very severe tax. In fact, the loading charges on most mutual funds are typically of the order of 1 or 2 percent. It would not be an onerous tax, but it could raise about $60 billion annually. Eighty percent of families would pay nothing, and 95 percent of families would pay less than $1,000. It would really only affect very rich families.
I also think we have to provide a much broader safety net in this country.
There are lots of things that we should do to strengthen our income support system. We can expand the Earned Income Tax Credit, which is now a fairly substantial aid to poor families, but which can be improved.
The minimum wage has fallen by about 35 percent in real terms since its peak in 1968. We should think about restoring the minimum wage to where it used to be. That would help a lot of low-income families.
The unemployment insurance system is in a real mess; only about one third of unemployed persons actually get unemployment benefits, either because they don’t qualify or because they exhaust their benefits after six months. Typically the replacement rate is about 35 or 40 percent. In the Netherlands, the replacement rate is 80 percent. Our unemployment insurance system is much less generous than in other industrialized countries and can certainly be shored up.
I would also Freeze All College Tuition rates and fees for 10yrs. and then after that, only let them increase the rate of tuition by the inflation rate.
Some of you may be thinking, "Oh, this is socialism". Call it whatever you want. It is fair and just.
Are you going to sit here and tell me that it is right that the richest 1% HOARD all their wealth, which they accumulated on the backs of the working class people in this country?
I say NO WAY. It is time the ULTRA SUPER RICH, ( are you listening Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet?) cough up some real cash that they have STOLEN on the backs of hard working Americans.
My above proposals will close this Wealth Inequality and Increase the amount of people going from poverty to the middle class.
They are good for the USA. They are morally right.
Jimbo
Wealth — strictly financial savings — provides security to individuals in the event of sickness, job loss or marital separation. Assets provide a kind of safety blanket that people can rely on in case their income gets interrupted.
The most common measure of wealth used, and the most understandable is: what share of total wealth is owned by the richest households, typically the top 1 percent. In the United States, in the last survey year, 1998, the richest 1 percent of households owned 38 percent of all wealth. The average 1% has a net worth of 13 million in the USA.
Here is the Problem.
We have had a fairly sharp increase in wealth inequality dating back to 1975 or 1976.
Prior to that, there was a protracted period when wealth inequality fell in this country, going back almost to 1929. So you have this fairly continuous downward trend from 1929, which of course was the peak of the stock market before it crashed, until just about the mid-1970s. Since then, things have really turned around, and the level of wealth inequality today is almost double what it was in the mid-1970s.
Income inequality has also risen. Most people date this rise to the early 1970s, but it hasn’t gone up nearly as dramatically as wealth inequality.
The top 5 percent own more than half of all wealth.
In 1998, they owned 59 percent of all wealth. Or to put it another way, the top 5 percent had more wealth than the remaining 95 percent of the population, collectively.
The top 20 percent owns over 80 percent of all wealth. In 1998, it owned 83 percent of all wealth.
This is a very concentrated distribution.
The bottom 20 percent basically have zero wealth. They either have no assets, or their debt equals or exceeds their assets. The bottom 20 percent has typically accumulated no savings.
We are much more unequal than any other advanced industrial country.
Perhaps our closest rival in terms of inequality is Great Britain. But where the top percent in this country own 38 percent of all wealth, in Great Britain it is more like 22 or 23 percent.
What is remarkable is that this was not always the case. Up until the early 1970s, the U.S. actually had lower wealth inequality than Great Britain, and even than a country like Sweden. But things have really turned around over the last 25 or 30 years. In fact, a lot of countries have experienced lessening wealth inequality over time. The U.S. is atypical in that inequality has risen so sharply over the last 25 or 30 years.
You may be asking, why should wealth inequality itself be a matter of concern?
I think there are two rationales. The first is basically a moral or ethical position. A lot of people think it is morally bad for there to be wide gaps, wide disparities in well being in a society.
If that is not convincing to a person, the second reason is that inequality is actually harmful to the well-being of a society. There is now a lot of evidence, based on cross-national comparisons of inequality and economic growth, that more unequal societies actually have lower rates of economic growth. The divisiveness that comes out of large disparities in income and wealth, is actually reflected in poorer economic performance of a country.
Typically when countries are more equal, educational achievement and benefits are more equally distributed in the country. In a country like the United States, there are still huge disparities in resources going to education, so quality of schooling and schooling performance are unequal. If you have a society with large concentrations of poor families, average school achievement is usually a lot lower than where you have a much more homogeneous middle class population, as you find in most Western European countries. So schooling suffers in this country, and, as a result, you get a labor force that is less well educated on average than in a country like the Netherlands, Germany or even France. So the high level of inequality results in less human capital being developed in this country, which ultimately affects economic performance.
One reason we have such high levels of inequality, compared to other advanced industrial countries, is because of our tax and, I would add, our social expenditure system. We have much lower taxes than almost every Western European country. And we have a less progressive tax system than almost every Western European country. As a result, the rich in this country manage to retain a much higher share of their income than they do in other countries, and this enables them to accumulate a much higher amount of wealth than the rich in other countries.
We have a much lower level of income support for poor families than do Western European countries or Canada. Social policy in Europe, Canada and Japan does a lot more to reduce economic disparities created by the marketplace than we do in this country. We have much higher poverty rates than do other advanced industrialized countries.
I propose a separate tax on wealth, which actually exists in a dozen European countries. This has helped to lessen inequality in European countries. It is also, I think, a fairer tax. If you think about taxes that reflect a family’s ability to pay, a family’s ability to pay is a reflection of their income, but also of their wealth holdings. A broader kind of tax of this nature, would not only produce more tax revenue, which we desperately need, but it would be a fairer tax, and also help to reduce the level of inequality in this country.
I would model it after the Swiss system, which I think is a pretty fair system. It would be a progressive tax. In the United States, the first $250,000 of wealth would be exempt from the tax. That would exclude 80 percent of all families. The tax would increase at increments, starting out at .2 percent from about $250,000 to $500,000. The marginal rate would go up to .4 percent from $500,000 to $1 million, and then to .6 percent from a $1 million to $5 million, and then to .8 thereafter.
It would not be a very severe tax. In fact, the loading charges on most mutual funds are typically of the order of 1 or 2 percent. It would not be an onerous tax, but it could raise about $60 billion annually. Eighty percent of families would pay nothing, and 95 percent of families would pay less than $1,000. It would really only affect very rich families.
I also think we have to provide a much broader safety net in this country.
There are lots of things that we should do to strengthen our income support system. We can expand the Earned Income Tax Credit, which is now a fairly substantial aid to poor families, but which can be improved.
The minimum wage has fallen by about 35 percent in real terms since its peak in 1968. We should think about restoring the minimum wage to where it used to be. That would help a lot of low-income families.
The unemployment insurance system is in a real mess; only about one third of unemployed persons actually get unemployment benefits, either because they don’t qualify or because they exhaust their benefits after six months. Typically the replacement rate is about 35 or 40 percent. In the Netherlands, the replacement rate is 80 percent. Our unemployment insurance system is much less generous than in other industrialized countries and can certainly be shored up.
I would also Freeze All College Tuition rates and fees for 10yrs. and then after that, only let them increase the rate of tuition by the inflation rate.
Some of you may be thinking, "Oh, this is socialism". Call it whatever you want. It is fair and just.
Are you going to sit here and tell me that it is right that the richest 1% HOARD all their wealth, which they accumulated on the backs of the working class people in this country?
I say NO WAY. It is time the ULTRA SUPER RICH, ( are you listening Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet?) cough up some real cash that they have STOLEN on the backs of hard working Americans.
My above proposals will close this Wealth Inequality and Increase the amount of people going from poverty to the middle class.
They are good for the USA. They are morally right.
Jimbo
Friday, October 3, 2008
90 yr.old Shoots herself thanks to Barney Frank and Fannie Mae. Shame on You Barney.
Addie Polk, 90, of Akron, Ohio, became a symbol of the nation's home mortgage crisis when she was hospitalized after shooting herself at least twice in the upper body Wednesday afternoon.
Residents of Akron have rallied behind Polk, who is being treated at Akron General Medical Center. She was listed in critical condition Friday afternoon.
"This bill does nothing for the Addie Polks of the world," Dennis Kucinich said after telling her story. "This bill fails to address the fact that millions of homeowners are facing foreclosure, are facing the loss of their home. This bill will take care of Wall Street, and the market may go up for a few days, but democracy is going downhill."
Now today, finally Fannie Mae said it will "forgive her debt". Of course it took the media shining the light on her case and then Addie, at the point of desperation, shooting herself; in order for Fannie Mae to Finally forgive her debt. Shame on you Fannie Mae.
Here, we the taxpayers bail out Fannie Mae to the tune of 200 billion, yet Fannie Mae "Finally finds it in their heart" to bail out Addie Polks mere 45K.
This reminds me of the wicked master in the Bible. He is forgiven a HUGE debt, but then, does not want to forgive someone who owes him a MUCH SMALLER amount.
Fannie Mae is that WICKED SERVANT.
And guess who is Fannie Mae's Patron Saint? You guessed it, no
ne other than Barney Frank.
You know Barney Frank right? He is that Fag Congressman from Massachusetts who once ran a Male Prostitute Ring right out of his own home. But instead of getting run out of Congress, he gets promoted to the head of the House Financial Services Committee . What a scumbag.
There you have the Fannie Mae problem in profile. Mr. Frank wants you to pick up the tab for its failures, while he still vows to block a reform that might prevent the same disaster from happening again.
At least the Massachusetts Democrat is consistent. His record is close to perfect as a stalwart opponent of reforming the two companies, going back more than a decade. The first concerted push to rein in Fan and Fred in Congress came as far back as 1992, and Mr. Frank was right there, standing athwart. But things really picked up this decade, and Barney was there at every turn. Let's roll the audiotape:
In 2000, then-Rep. Richard Baker proposed a bill to reform Fannie and Freddie's oversight. Mr. Frank dismissed the idea, saying concerns about the two were "overblown" and that there was "no federal liability there whatsoever."
Two years later, Mr. Frank was at it again. "I do not regard Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as problems," he said in response to another reform push. And then: "I regard them as great assets." Great or not, we'll give Mr. Frank this: Their assets are now Uncle Sam's assets, even if those come along with $5.4 trillion in debt and other liabilities.
Again in June 2003, the favorite of the Beltway press corps assured the public that "there is no federal guarantee" of Fan and Fred obligations.
A month later, Freddie Mac's multibillion-dollar accounting scandal broke into the open. But Mr. Frank was sanguine. "I do not think we are facing any kind of a crisis," he said at the time.
Three months later he repeated the claim that Fannie and Freddie posed no "threat to the Treasury." Even suggesting that heresy, he added, could become "a self-fulfilling prophecy."
In April 2004, Fannie announced a multibillion-dollar financial "misstatement" of its own. Mr. Frank was back for the defense. Fannie and Freddie posed no risk to taxpayers, he said, adding that "I think Wall Street will get over it" if the two collapsed. Yes, they're certainly "over it" on the Street now that Uncle Sam is guaranteeing their Fannie paper, and even Fannie's subordinated debt.
In January of last year, Mr. Frank also noted one reason he liked Fannie and Freddie so much: They were subject to his political direction. Contrasting Fan and Fred with private-sector mortgage financiers, he noted, "I can ask Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to show forbearance" in a housing crisis. That is to say, because Fannie and Freddie are political creatures, Mr. Frank believed they would do his bidding.
And this is exactly what Mr. Frank attempted to prove when the housing market started to go south. He encouraged the companies to guarantee more "affordable" mortgages, thus abetting their disastrous plunge into subprime and Alt-A loans. He also pushed for, and got, an increase in the conforming-loan limits to allow Fan and Fred to securitize and guarantee larger mortgages. And he pressured regulators to ease up on their capital requirements -- which now means taxpayers will have to make up that capital shortfall.
But the biggest payoff for Mr. Frank is the "affordable housing" trust fund he managed to push through as one political price for the recent Fannie reform bill. This fund siphons off a portion of Fannie and Freddie profits -- as much as $500 million a year each -- to a fund that politicians can then disburse to their favorite special interests.
Mr. Frank has had many accomplices from both parties in his protection of Fan and Fred. But he was and is among the most vociferous and powerful. In any other area of American life, this track record would get a man run out of town. In Washington, he's hailed as a sage whose history of willful error will be forgotten faster than taxpayers can write a check for $200 billion.
Shame Shame and Triple Shame on Barney (Fag) Frank.
Jimbo
Residents of Akron have rallied behind Polk, who is being treated at Akron General Medical Center. She was listed in critical condition Friday afternoon.
"This bill does nothing for the Addie Polks of the world," Dennis Kucinich said after telling her story. "This bill fails to address the fact that millions of homeowners are facing foreclosure, are facing the loss of their home. This bill will take care of Wall Street, and the market may go up for a few days, but democracy is going downhill."
Now today, finally Fannie Mae said it will "forgive her debt". Of course it took the media shining the light on her case and then Addie, at the point of desperation, shooting herself; in order for Fannie Mae to Finally forgive her debt. Shame on you Fannie Mae.
Here, we the taxpayers bail out Fannie Mae to the tune of 200 billion, yet Fannie Mae "Finally finds it in their heart" to bail out Addie Polks mere 45K.
This reminds me of the wicked master in the Bible. He is forgiven a HUGE debt, but then, does not want to forgive someone who owes him a MUCH SMALLER amount.
Fannie Mae is that WICKED SERVANT.
And guess who is Fannie Mae's Patron Saint? You guessed it, no
ne other than Barney Frank.You know Barney Frank right? He is that Fag Congressman from Massachusetts who once ran a Male Prostitute Ring right out of his own home. But instead of getting run out of Congress, he gets promoted to the head of the House Financial Services Committee . What a scumbag.
There you have the Fannie Mae problem in profile. Mr. Frank wants you to pick up the tab for its failures, while he still vows to block a reform that might prevent the same disaster from happening again.
At least the Massachusetts Democrat is consistent. His record is close to perfect as a stalwart opponent of reforming the two companies, going back more than a decade. The first concerted push to rein in Fan and Fred in Congress came as far back as 1992, and Mr. Frank was right there, standing athwart. But things really picked up this decade, and Barney was there at every turn. Let's roll the audiotape:
In 2000, then-Rep. Richard Baker proposed a bill to reform Fannie and Freddie's oversight. Mr. Frank dismissed the idea, saying concerns about the two were "overblown" and that there was "no federal liability there whatsoever."
Two years later, Mr. Frank was at it again. "I do not regard Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as problems," he said in response to another reform push. And then: "I regard them as great assets." Great or not, we'll give Mr. Frank this: Their assets are now Uncle Sam's assets, even if those come along with $5.4 trillion in debt and other liabilities.
Again in June 2003, the favorite of the Beltway press corps assured the public that "there is no federal guarantee" of Fan and Fred obligations.
A month later, Freddie Mac's multibillion-dollar accounting scandal broke into the open. But Mr. Frank was sanguine. "I do not think we are facing any kind of a crisis," he said at the time.
Three months later he repeated the claim that Fannie and Freddie posed no "threat to the Treasury." Even suggesting that heresy, he added, could become "a self-fulfilling prophecy."
In April 2004, Fannie announced a multibillion-dollar financial "misstatement" of its own. Mr. Frank was back for the defense. Fannie and Freddie posed no risk to taxpayers, he said, adding that "I think Wall Street will get over it" if the two collapsed. Yes, they're certainly "over it" on the Street now that Uncle Sam is guaranteeing their Fannie paper, and even Fannie's subordinated debt.
In January of last year, Mr. Frank also noted one reason he liked Fannie and Freddie so much: They were subject to his political direction. Contrasting Fan and Fred with private-sector mortgage financiers, he noted, "I can ask Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to show forbearance" in a housing crisis. That is to say, because Fannie and Freddie are political creatures, Mr. Frank believed they would do his bidding.
And this is exactly what Mr. Frank attempted to prove when the housing market started to go south. He encouraged the companies to guarantee more "affordable" mortgages, thus abetting their disastrous plunge into subprime and Alt-A loans. He also pushed for, and got, an increase in the conforming-loan limits to allow Fan and Fred to securitize and guarantee larger mortgages. And he pressured regulators to ease up on their capital requirements -- which now means taxpayers will have to make up that capital shortfall.
But the biggest payoff for Mr. Frank is the "affordable housing" trust fund he managed to push through as one political price for the recent Fannie reform bill. This fund siphons off a portion of Fannie and Freddie profits -- as much as $500 million a year each -- to a fund that politicians can then disburse to their favorite special interests.
Mr. Frank has had many accomplices from both parties in his protection of Fan and Fred. But he was and is among the most vociferous and powerful. In any other area of American life, this track record would get a man run out of town. In Washington, he's hailed as a sage whose history of willful error will be forgotten faster than taxpayers can write a check for $200 billion.
Shame Shame and Triple Shame on Barney (Fag) Frank.
Jimbo
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Word to McCain. Step up the fight or Lose.
McCain is losing ground to Obama based on all the polls. McCain was up in Florida. Now he is even. McCain was up in Ohio. Now he is even.
Here is my advise for John McCain.
Intensify the fight against the Fascist Barack Hussein Obama.
Run continual negative ads in key states like Ohio, Michigan, Florida, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, Minnesota, Iowa, Pennsylvania, New Mexico.
Run ads that remind voters of why they are scared of Barack Hussein Obama. Say that name in the ad. Over and over again, remind people of what his full name is.
Why? Because Barack Hussein Obama has a Muslim past. He was raised in Indonesia (Muslim country). He spent much time in a madrass (Muslim school).
Even last month when Stephanopoulos was interviewing him, Obama made the "mistake" and said, "my MUSLIM religion".
Next, remind voters about how Obama wants to squash free speech. That's right, Obama wants expanded hate speech laws. What that means is that anything you say that HE disagrees with, is considered "hate speech".
For example, if Obama becomes President, if a pastor speaks out against homosexuality, that would be considered "hate speech", punishable by prison time.
Make no mistake about it. Barack Hussein Obama will squash free speech on the radio as well.
He wants to pass the so-called "fairness act" in radio. What that means is that if you are a Conservative talk show host on the radio, the "fairness" act would shut you down unless you gave a Liberal the same amount of radio time. Or worse than that, if you are a religious broadcasting station, like Moody Bible Institute, Obama's "fairness act" would effectively shut them down because they don't equal time to say the Muslim point of view.
Also, McCain needs to remind people over and over again how Obama is for Infanticide.
Plus, remind voters over and over again how Obama is for Homosexuality/Sex education being Forced on your K-3rd graders.
Show an ad with Obama having a beer and pizza with terrorist leaders, since Obama wants to talk to terrorist leaders with NO pre-conditions. Then show a split screen of 9/11.
Bottom line is this. McCain needs to run negative ads often.
Negative ads work.
Also, McCain needs to come out with a new populist message with specific policies that the average Joe six-pack came sink his teeth into.
For example, how about a $5000 tax credit for each child. How about talking about the specific jobs that would become available because McCain is for expanding Nuclear Power plants, Coal, and Natural Gas plants.
How about this. Calling for a freeze on College tuition for 10yrs. to let incomes catch up, then only letting them increase tuition by the inflation rate.
How about coming out with a bail out package for the unemployed worker and person in foreclosure and the main street businesses.
Say no to a blank check for Hank Paulson and Wall st.
How about starting to promote American jobs. For example, the first customer service rep you talk to MUST be from America, instead of India. Punish companies with tariffs for shipping jobs overseas.
Make the corporate tax rate 0 for companies that provide manufacturing jobs here in America on items that are not currently made here anymore like clothes, toys.
How about an aggressive Infrastructure jobs program like the one FDR had to get Americans back to work.
McCain needs to get off the same tired old "pork barrel spending" and "earmarks" line.
My wife doesn't even know what an earmark is. And so don't most Voters.
Start this now McCain or Lose.
Jimbo
Here is my advise for John McCain.
Intensify the fight against the Fascist Barack Hussein Obama.
Run continual negative ads in key states like Ohio, Michigan, Florida, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, Minnesota, Iowa, Pennsylvania, New Mexico.
Run ads that remind voters of why they are scared of Barack Hussein Obama. Say that name in the ad. Over and over again, remind people of what his full name is.
Why? Because Barack Hussein Obama has a Muslim past. He was raised in Indonesia (Muslim country). He spent much time in a madrass (Muslim school).
Even last month when Stephanopoulos was interviewing him, Obama made the "mistake" and said, "my MUSLIM religion".
Next, remind voters about how Obama wants to squash free speech. That's right, Obama wants expanded hate speech laws. What that means is that anything you say that HE disagrees with, is considered "hate speech".
For example, if Obama becomes President, if a pastor speaks out against homosexuality, that would be considered "hate speech", punishable by prison time.
Make no mistake about it. Barack Hussein Obama will squash free speech on the radio as well.
He wants to pass the so-called "fairness act" in radio. What that means is that if you are a Conservative talk show host on the radio, the "fairness" act would shut you down unless you gave a Liberal the same amount of radio time. Or worse than that, if you are a religious broadcasting station, like Moody Bible Institute, Obama's "fairness act" would effectively shut them down because they don't equal time to say the Muslim point of view.
Also, McCain needs to remind people over and over again how Obama is for Infanticide.
Plus, remind voters over and over again how Obama is for Homosexuality/Sex education being Forced on your K-3rd graders.
Show an ad with Obama having a beer and pizza with terrorist leaders, since Obama wants to talk to terrorist leaders with NO pre-conditions. Then show a split screen of 9/11.
Bottom line is this. McCain needs to run negative ads often.
Negative ads work.
Also, McCain needs to come out with a new populist message with specific policies that the average Joe six-pack came sink his teeth into.
For example, how about a $5000 tax credit for each child. How about talking about the specific jobs that would become available because McCain is for expanding Nuclear Power plants, Coal, and Natural Gas plants.
How about this. Calling for a freeze on College tuition for 10yrs. to let incomes catch up, then only letting them increase tuition by the inflation rate.
How about coming out with a bail out package for the unemployed worker and person in foreclosure and the main street businesses.
Say no to a blank check for Hank Paulson and Wall st.
How about starting to promote American jobs. For example, the first customer service rep you talk to MUST be from America, instead of India. Punish companies with tariffs for shipping jobs overseas.
Make the corporate tax rate 0 for companies that provide manufacturing jobs here in America on items that are not currently made here anymore like clothes, toys.
How about an aggressive Infrastructure jobs program like the one FDR had to get Americans back to work.
McCain needs to get off the same tired old "pork barrel spending" and "earmarks" line.
My wife doesn't even know what an earmark is. And so don't most Voters.
Start this now McCain or Lose.
Jimbo
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Chicago White Sox win A.L. Central!!!
From time to time I blog about something other than politics.
Now is that time again.
My beloved Chicago White Sox defeat the Minnesota Twins tonight, winning the A.L. Central.
I am so excited because this is the first year since I have been alive that both the White Sox and the Cubs are in the playoffs.
Go Sox!
Now on Thursday, they play the Tampa Bay Rays. 
Good thing its during the daytime so I won't miss the VP debate.
Here are some pictures from tonight.
Monday, September 29, 2008
Shocking Video shows Democrats in their own words Covering up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Over and over again, since the collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, democrats in Congress and Obama himself have been calling for "more oversight" and "more regulation".
The Democrats keep claiming that McCain and the Republicans were for deregulation of the Financial Services arena and that "they" (the democrats) will be the ones to fix the problem.
Obama calls McCain "too risky" because of deregulation.
However, as this Shocking new Video shows; its the Democrats that were covering up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Franklin Raines, the guy in charge of Fannie Mae (and Obama's good buddy) "cooked the books" in order to give himself and others on Fannie Mae's board BIG FAT BONUSES.
Democrats, KNOWING this, continue OVER and OVER again try to cover up Fannie Mae.
Utterly Shameful!
Watch the Video:
The Democrats keep claiming that McCain and the Republicans were for deregulation of the Financial Services arena and that "they" (the democrats) will be the ones to fix the problem.
Obama calls McCain "too risky" because of deregulation.
However, as this Shocking new Video shows; its the Democrats that were covering up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Franklin Raines, the guy in charge of Fannie Mae (and Obama's good buddy) "cooked the books" in order to give himself and others on Fannie Mae's board BIG FAT BONUSES.
Democrats, KNOWING this, continue OVER and OVER again try to cover up Fannie Mae.
Utterly Shameful!
Watch the Video:
Utterly Shameful of Democrats and Barack Obama.
Jimbo
Sunday, September 28, 2008
If Obama becomes President, expect more Sodomy like this!
Consider this; all of you undecided voters out there.
Barack Obama has said that he would be "the gays best advocate" once being elected President.
Obama is Strongly supported by ALL gay groups across the country.
Today, in San Fransisco, the Folsom Street Fair (an annual event) is upon us.
Caution: These photos are only for adults:
I am warning you first.
At the Folsom St. Fair, public nudity and sexual deviance is the NORM.
Any attempts to speak out against this perversion means jail time for you.
Here is what goes on in PUBLIC in BROAD DAYLIGHT in San Fransicko.
• Rampant public nudity including men walking the streets in nothing but their socks and sneakers;
• Public street orgies in which men engage in heinous sex acts – as depicted on these enlarged photos [blow-ups of AFTAH web photos like those HERE and HERE] — as thousands of fairgoers walk by;
• Public sadistic whippings, acts of “consensual” degradation including men urinating on one another – for pleasure — and “master-and-slave” partners or perverse arrangements in which one partner plays the role of an animal, led around on a dog-collar by his “master”;
• Blatant anti-Christian bigotry – e.g., the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” — transvestite mock “nuns” who work closely with Folsom; and religious-themed “sex toys” sold by vendors;
• Public health hazards: Folsom promotes local gay sex clubs like “Blow Buddies” and Steamworks, a Berkeley bathhouse where men go for anonymous sexual encounters with other men (including condomless, “barebacking” anal sex) that spread diseases;
• Police blame their inaction amidst all the illegal, debauched acts on politicians who tell them not to intervene or enforce the law. At the same time, the SFPD recruits at this sordid affair [the police have a booth at Folsom again this year] — an all-time low and embarrassment for men in blue everywhere whose mission is supposed to be “law enforcement.”
Worse yet, parents were bringing their children to see this filth. (see picture above).
Folks, what can you say in the face of such perversion and blasphemy as the above? I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that no modern special interest movement in America possesses the capacity for anti-Christian bigotry and anti-Christian persecution as the combined homosexual (”GLBT”) movement. “Leathermen” like the above are a celebrated part of the overall “gay” male subculture (which is not to deny that many homosexuals would take offense at this blasphemy) – their feigned ”macho-ness” an obvious over-compensation for the masculinity crisis that is male homosexuality.
You may be saying to yourself, To each his own? “I don’t prefer to have sex in the streets, but if that’s your thing, go for it”? San Francisco is a lesson in the evils of liberal, open-ended “tolerance.” On the one hand, the city’s supervisors and left-wing activists harass and condemn Christian youth who seek to promote virtue and a godly lifestyle to San Francisco teenagers. Then the same city leaders welcome with open arms — and emasculated law enforcement — the most perverted public street festival imaginable, with a strong dose of anti-Christian bigotry to boot.
More important than what Folsom says about sadomasochists — after all, those were proud perverts out on Sunday — is what it says about (mostly straight) social liberals and libertarians. Quick to bash – that is, judge – the “religious right,” they are deathly afraid of criticizing or “judging” anything homosexuality-related, even heinous perversion festivals where human beings are walked around with collars like dogs! How troubled are you that Speaker Pelosi has carefully couched her words so as not to offend those who would reconfigure the Last Supper to include sex toys and deviant “fetishists”?
So what does this have to do with Obama, you ask?
Obama wants to repeal the DOMA (Defense of Marriage act). This was signed by President Clinton in 1996.
The DOMA has two parts: one defines marriage as between a man and a woman, and the second part says a homosexual marriage in one state does not have to be recognized in another state.
Under an Obama regime, if 2 men got married in California and then moved to Oklahoma, then Oklahoma MUST recognize that homosexual marriage, even though Oklahoma has voted to ban homosexual marriage. Understand that Obama considers homosexual rights on par with the civil rights of blacks.
This sicko event in San Fransisco will broaden under an Obama regime.
Make no mistake about it.
Obama's head is up the behind of the Gay Mafia.
Don't buy his empty rhetoric about his "so-called christian values".
Anyone who names the name of Jesus and then supports this perverted lifestyle and hatefulness against anyone who speaks out against it, is FACIST.
Plain and simple.
Obama is part of the FACIST left wing.
Tolerance for Christians, NO.
Tolerance for Radical Gays, YES.
Tolerance for moral values, NO
Tolerance for perverted public nudity, Yes.
No Obama, Please.
Jimbo
Barack Obama has said that he would be "the gays best advocate" once being elected President.
Obama is Strongly supported by ALL gay groups across the country.
Today, in San Fransisco, the Folsom Street Fair (an annual event) is upon us.
Caution: These photos are only for adults:
I am warning you first.
At the Folsom St. Fair, public nudity and sexual deviance is the NORM.
Any attempts to speak out against this perversion means jail time for you.
Here is what goes on in PUBLIC in BROAD DAYLIGHT in San Fransicko.
• Rampant public nudity including men walking the streets in nothing but their socks and sneakers;
• Public street orgies in which men engage in heinous sex acts – as depicted on these enlarged photos [blow-ups of AFTAH web photos like those HERE and HERE] — as thousands of fairgoers walk by;
• Public sadistic whippings, acts of “consensual” degradation including men urinating on one another – for pleasure — and “master-and-slave” partners or perverse arrangements in which one partner plays the role of an animal, led around on a dog-collar by his “master”;
• Blatant anti-Christian bigotry – e.g., the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” — transvestite mock “nuns” who work closely with Folsom; and religious-themed “sex toys” sold by vendors;
• Public health hazards: Folsom promotes local gay sex clubs like “Blow Buddies” and Steamworks, a Berkeley bathhouse where men go for anonymous sexual encounters with other men (including condomless, “barebacking” anal sex) that spread diseases;
• Police blame their inaction amidst all the illegal, debauched acts on politicians who tell them not to intervene or enforce the law. At the same time, the SFPD recruits at this sordid affair [the police have a booth at Folsom again this year] — an all-time low and embarrassment for men in blue everywhere whose mission is supposed to be “law enforcement.”
Worse yet, parents were bringing their children to see this filth. (see picture above).
Folks, what can you say in the face of such perversion and blasphemy as the above? I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that no modern special interest movement in America possesses the capacity for anti-Christian bigotry and anti-Christian persecution as the combined homosexual (”GLBT”) movement. “Leathermen” like the above are a celebrated part of the overall “gay” male subculture (which is not to deny that many homosexuals would take offense at this blasphemy) – their feigned ”macho-ness” an obvious over-compensation for the masculinity crisis that is male homosexuality.
You may be saying to yourself, To each his own? “I don’t prefer to have sex in the streets, but if that’s your thing, go for it”? San Francisco is a lesson in the evils of liberal, open-ended “tolerance.” On the one hand, the city’s supervisors and left-wing activists harass and condemn Christian youth who seek to promote virtue and a godly lifestyle to San Francisco teenagers. Then the same city leaders welcome with open arms — and emasculated law enforcement — the most perverted public street festival imaginable, with a strong dose of anti-Christian bigotry to boot.
More important than what Folsom says about sadomasochists — after all, those were proud perverts out on Sunday — is what it says about (mostly straight) social liberals and libertarians. Quick to bash – that is, judge – the “religious right,” they are deathly afraid of criticizing or “judging” anything homosexuality-related, even heinous perversion festivals where human beings are walked around with collars like dogs! How troubled are you that Speaker Pelosi has carefully couched her words so as not to offend those who would reconfigure the Last Supper to include sex toys and deviant “fetishists”?
So what does this have to do with Obama, you ask?
Obama wants to repeal the DOMA (Defense of Marriage act). This was signed by President Clinton in 1996.
The DOMA has two parts: one defines marriage as between a man and a woman, and the second part says a homosexual marriage in one state does not have to be recognized in another state.
Under an Obama regime, if 2 men got married in California and then moved to Oklahoma, then Oklahoma MUST recognize that homosexual marriage, even though Oklahoma has voted to ban homosexual marriage. Understand that Obama considers homosexual rights on par with the civil rights of blacks.
This sicko event in San Fransisco will broaden under an Obama regime.
Make no mistake about it.
Obama's head is up the behind of the Gay Mafia.
Don't buy his empty rhetoric about his "so-called christian values".
Anyone who names the name of Jesus and then supports this perverted lifestyle and hatefulness against anyone who speaks out against it, is FACIST.
Plain and simple.
Obama is part of the FACIST left wing.
Tolerance for Christians, NO.
Tolerance for Radical Gays, YES.
Tolerance for moral values, NO
Tolerance for perverted public nudity, Yes.
No Obama, Please.
Jimbo
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)